Citation network
Ricketts Vs. Adamson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 22, 1987
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 1 (1987) U.S. Supreme Court Ricketts v. AdamsonSearch
-
U.S. 1 (1987) Ricketts v. AdamsonSearch
-
no indication that he did not fully understand the potential seriousness of the position he adopted. Cf. United States v. ScottSearch
-
the Arizona Supreme Court reversed the convictions of Dunlap and Robison and remanded their cases for retrial. State v. DunlapSearch
-
Adamson v. SuperiorSearch
-
agreement. The District Court dismissed his petition, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed, Adamson v. HillSearch
-
was then convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to death. The judgment was affirmed on direct appeal, State v. AdamsonSearch
-
F.2d at 728 (citing Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
Id. at 740 (Brunetti, J., dissenting) (quoting United States v. ScottSearch
-
would have precluded prosecution of respondent for the greater charge on which he now stands convicted. Brown v. OhioSearch
-
stood charged with first-degree murder. Trial on that charge did not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause. United States v. ScottSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Ohio v. JohnsonSearch
-
Jeffers v. UnitedSearch
-
guided this Court in evaluating the promises and conduct of state prosecutors in securing a guilty plea. Santobello v. NewSearch
-
conditional on an act by Adamson that breached the agreement, such as refusing to testify as it required. Adamson v. SuperiorSearch
-
analogy or point of departure in construing a plea agreement, or in framing the terms of the debate. E.g., Blackledge v. AllisonSearch
-
that a letter of the sort that Adamson sent does not constitute anticipatory repudiation. In New York Life Ins. Co. v. ViglasSearch
-
Kimel v. MissouriSearch
-
of the plea-bargaining system. Guilty pleas are enforceable only if taken voluntarily and intelligently. E.g., Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
not to bar retrial of a defendant who Page 483 U. S. 24 successfully moves for a mistrial. United States v. DinitzSearch
-
Id. at 424 U. S. 610 . In United States v. ScottSearch
-
been deprived of its valued right to 'one complete opportunity to convict those who have violated its laws.' Arizona v. WashingtonSearch
-
Id. at 437 U. S. 100 . The Court today relies exclusively on the first rationale of United States v. ScottSearch
-
Equitable Trust Co. v. WesternSearch
-
a breach of the contract, and that Hochster did not need to wait until after the starting date to bring suit. In Roehm v. HorstSearch
-
Since New York Life Ins. Co. v. ViglasSearch
-
and thereby evinces a lack of good faith. Pacific Coast Engineering Co. v. Merritt-ChapmanSearch
-
F.2d 889, 895-896 (CA9 1969) (emphasis added). Others have interpreted the rule expansively. E.g., Bill's Coal Co. v. BoardSearch
-
whether the State's actions in this case amount to prosecutorial or judicial vindictiveness. Cf. North Carolina v. PearceSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Ricketts v. AdamsonSearch
-
Cf. United States v. ScottSearch
-
State v. DunlapSearch
-
Adamson v. HillSearch
-
State v. AdamsonSearch
-
Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
United States v. ScottSearch
-
Brown v. OhioSearch
-
the Double Jeopardy Clause. United States v. ScottSearch
-
Ohio v. JohnsonSearch
-
Santobello v. NewSearch
-
E.g., Blackledge v. AllisonSearch
-
In New York Life Ins. Co. v. ViglasSearch
-
E.g., Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
In United States v. ScottSearch
-
Arizona v. WashingtonSearch
-
of United States v. ScottSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial