Citation network
South Dakota Vs. Dole
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 23, 1987
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 203 (1987) U.S. Supreme Court South Dakota v. DoleSearch
-
U.S. 203 (1987) South Dakota v. DoleSearch
-
the proper scope of the Twenty-first Amendment. Relying on our statement in California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. MidcalSearch
-
the meaning of the Twenty-first Amendment, the bounds of which have escaped precise definition. Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. DiasSearch
-
U. S. 448 , 448 U. S. 474 (1980) (opinion of Burger, C.J.). See Lau v. NicholsSearch
-
Oklahoma Page 483 U. S. 207 v. CivilSearch
-
Steward Machine Co. v. DavisSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 548 (1937). The breadth of this power was made clear in United States v. ButlerSearch
-
grant of federal funds. The spending power is of course not unlimited, Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSearch
-
See Helvering v. DavisSearch
-
is intended to serve general public purposes, courts should defer substantially to the judgment of Congress. Helvering v. DavisSearch
-
Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSearch
-
Massachusetts v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 461 Page 483 U. S. 208 (1978) (plurality opinion). See also Ivanhoe Irrigation Dist. v. McCrackenSearch
-
constitutional provisions may provide an independent bar to the conditional grant of federal funds. Lawrence County v. Lead-DeadwoodSearch
-
King v. SmithSearch
-
Helvering v. DavisSearch
-
to the conditional grant of federal funds. Lawrence County v. Lead-DeadwoodSearch
-
limitation on the spending power is not of the kind petitioner suggests. United States v. ButlerSearch
-
state affairs did not concomitantly limit the range of conditions legitimately placed on federal grants. In Oklahoma v. CivilSearch
-
Id. at 330 U. S. 143 -144 (citation omitted). See also Steward Machine Co. v. DavisSearch
-
Massachusetts v. MellonSearch
-
is a judicially enforceable restriction at all. See Buckley v. ValeoSearch
-
Oklahoma v. CivilSearch
-
the expenditure must be for the general welfare, Helvering v. DavisSearch
-
U. S. 640 -641 (1937), the conditions imposed must be unambiguous, Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSearch
-
U. S. 17 (1981), they must be reasonably related to the purpose of the expenditure, Massachusetts v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 461 , and the legislation may not violate any independent constitutional prohibition, Lawrence County v. Lead-DeadwoodSearch
-
grants under the spending power only in ways reasonably related to the purpose of the federal program. Massachusetts v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 19-20. This approach harks back to United States v. ButlerSearch
-
but it was regulation that today would likely be considered within Congress' commerce power. See, e.g., Katzenbach v. McClungSearch
-
grants in ways that can fairly be said to be related to the expenditure of federal funds. For example, in Oklahoma v. CSCSearch
-
by the Court may be viewed as independently justified under some regulatory power of the Congress. Thus, in Fullilove v. KlutznickSearch
-
of the Fourteenth Amendment. Id. at 448 U. S. 476 , 448 U. S. 478 . See also Lau v. NicholsSearch
-
within the scope of those powers reserved to the States by the Twenty-first Amendment. Capital Cities Cable, Inc. v. CrispSearch
-
U. S. 691 , 467 U. S. 716 (1984). As I emphasized in 324 Liquor Corp. v. DuffySearch
-
United States ought not obscure its fundamental character. It remains a Government of enumerated powers. McCulloch v. MarylandSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court South Dakota v. DoleSearch
-
California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. MidcalSearch
-
of Burger, C.J.). See Lau v. NicholsSearch
-
of Congress. Helvering v. DavisSearch
-
Lawrence County v. Lead-DeadwoodSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial