Citation network
Bowen Vs. Gilliard
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 25, 1987
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 587 (1987) U.S. Supreme Court Bowen v. GilliardSearch
-
U.S. 587 (1987) Bowen v. GilliardSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
for its decision. Cf. Lyng v. CastilloSearch
-
per month. Gilliard v. CraigSearch
-
the State in exchange for AFDC benefits for the entire family was a taking of the child's private property. Gilliard v. KirkSearch
-
Castro, 429 U. S. 181 , 429 U. S. 185 (1976), quoting Helvering v. DavisSearch
-
Schweiker v. HoganSearch
-
California v. AznavorianSearch
-
Termini v. CalifanoSearch
-
Page 483 U. S. 600 see also Lyng v. CastilloSearch
-
Lindsley v. NaturalSearch
-
Metropolis Theatre Co. v. CitySearch
-
U. S. 420 , 366 U. S. 426 . Dandridge v. WilliamsSearch
-
U.S. at 397 U. S. 485 . See also Weinberger v. SalfiSearch
-
Moore v. EastSearch
-
As was the case with the marriage-related provision upheld in Califano v. JobstSearch
-
rather than an individual, basis. Lyng v. CastilloSearch
-
and substantially' interfere with family living arrangements, and thereby burden a fundamental right. Zablocki v. RedhailSearch
-
label seems to have a bit more plausibility. For legal purposes though, the two situations are identical. See Bowen v. PublicSearch
-
Connolly v. PensionSearch
-
may be, it is not so substantial as to constitute a taking under our precedents. See Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSearch
-
Agins v. TilburonSearch
-
Penn Central Transportation Co. v. NewSearch
-
support payments on the child's behalf, and that the child will enjoy the same rights with respect to them. See Layton v. LaytonSearch
-
a child support obligation is the noncustodial parent's ability to make payments, see Coggins Page 483 U. S. 608 v. CogginsSearch
-
Gorrie v. BowenSearch
-
Armstrong v. UnitedSearch
-
so when it responds to that decision by supplementing the collections of support money with additional AFDC benefits. v. WritingSearch
-
Court. The Constitution may impose certain procedural safeguards upon systems of welfare administration, Goldberg v. KellySearch
-
Together with No. 86-564, Flaherty, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Human Resources, et al. v. GilliardSearch
-
The AFDC program is based on a scheme of cooperative federalism.' King v. SmithSearch
-
financial assistance to needy dependent children and the parents or relatives who live with and care for them,' Shea v. VialpandoSearch
-
Gilliard v. CraigSearch
-
a)(1)(vii) (1986). The District Court carefully considered these statutory arguments and rejected them. Gilliard v. KirkSearch
-
meaning of the statute, and find no merit in appellees' statutory arguments advanced in this Court. See also Gorrie v. BowenSearch
-
The District Court relied on the following paragraph of the opinion of the North Carolina Supreme Court in Goodyear v. GoodyearSearch
-
The only Court of Appeals, see Gorrie v. BowenSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial