Citation network
GriffIn Vs. Wisconsin
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 26, 1987
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 868 (1987) U.S. Supreme Court Griffin v. WisconsinSearch
-
U.S. 868 (1987) Griffin v. WisconsinSearch
-
to a warrant (and thus supported by probable cause, as the Constitution says warrants must be), see, e.g., Payton v. NewSearch
-
New Jersey v. T.LSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
may conduct warrantless, work-related searches of employees' desks and offices without probable cause, O'Connor v. OrtegaSearch
-
school officials may conduct warrantless searches of some student property, also without probable cause, New Jersey v. T.LSearch
-
Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
Court, 387 U. S. 523 , 387 U. S. 538 (1967). See New York v. BurgerSearch
-
period of genuine rehabilitation, and that the community is not harmed by the probationer's being at large. See State v. TarrellSearch
-
would make it more difficult for probation officials to respond quickly to evidence of misconduct, see New Jersey v. T.LSearch
-
would reduce the deterrent effect that the possibility of expeditious searches would otherwise create, see New York v. BurgerSearch
-
f), (g). As was true, then, in O'Connor v. OrtegaSearch
-
U. S. 709 (1987), and New Jersey v. T.LSearch
-
O'Lone v. EstateSearch
-
of Shabazz, 482 U. S. 342 , 482 U. S. 349 (1987) (quoting Turner v. SafleySearch
-
so unnatural an interpretation of the language that the regulation would fail to provide adequate notice. Cf. Kolender v. LawsonSearch
-
term as referring not to a quantum of evidence, but merely to a requirement of reasonableness. See, e.g., Marshall v. Barlow'sSearch
-
See O'Connor v. OrtegaSearch
-
See Marshall v. Barlow'sSearch
-
Marshall v. Barlow'sSearch
-
the bastion in which one has a legitimate expectation of privacy protected by the Fourth Amendment. See Silverman v. UnitedSearch
-
and seizures in a home violate the Fourth Amendment absent consent or exigent circumstances. See, e.g., United States v. KaroSearch
-
Steagald v. UnitedSearch
-
Payton v. NewSearch
-
United States v. UnitedSearch
-
business. See, e.g., New York v. BurgerSearch
-
be respected to the degree that it is not incompatible with substantial governmental needs. The Court in New Jersey v. T.LSearch
-
not the result of an ordinary home visit by petitioner's probation agent for which no warrant is required. Cf. Wyman v. JamesSearch
-
This conclusion overlooks the fact that administrative warrants are issued by the judiciary. See, e.g., Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
inside the walls of a prison. Bell v. WolfishSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Griffin v. WisconsinSearch
-
See New York v. BurgerSearch
-
See State v. TarrellSearch
-
and New Jersey v. T.LSearch
-
Cf. Kolender v. LawsonSearch
-
the Fourth Amendment. See Silverman v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Wyman v. JamesSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial