Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Kelly Vs. Robinson

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 01, 1986

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

36 entries 5 linked 31 unlinked
Show
  1. Offshore Logistics, Inc. Vs. Tallentire US Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1986
  2. Younger Vs. Harris US Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1971
  3. Perez Vs. Ledesma US Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1971
  4. Bank of MarIn Vs. England US Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1966
  5. Swarts Vs. Hammer US Supreme Court · May 16, 1904
  6. U.S. 36 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court Kelly v. Robinson
    Search
  7. U.S. 36 (1986) Kelly v. Robinson
    Search
  8. to change the interpretation of a judicially created concept, it makes that intent specific. Midlantic National Bank v. New
    Search
  9. concluding that the 1981 discharge in bankruptcy had not altered the conditions of Robinson's probation. Robinson v. McGuigan
    Search
  10. court adopted the analysis it had applied in a similar case decided one month earlier, In re Pellegrino (Pellegrino v. Division
    Search
  11. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor
    Search
  12. U. S. 207 , 477 U. S. 221 (1986) (quoting Mastro Plastics Corp. v. NLRB
    Search
  13. U. S. 270 , 350 U. S. 285 (1956) (in turn quoting United States v. Heirs
    Search
  14. State v. Mosesson
    Search
  15. Code silently abrogated another exception created by courts construing the old Act. In Midlantic National Bank v. New
    Search
  16. Id. at 474 U. S. 501 (quoting Swarts v. Hammer
    Search
  17. most powerful of the considerations that should influence a court considering equitable types of relief. See Younger v. Harris
    Search
  18. TVA v. Hill
    Search
  19. or sanctions imposed in civil proceedings, the reasoning of Moore was widely accepted. See, e.g., Parker v. United
    Search
  20. Zwick v. Freeman
    Search
  21. For other decisions adopting this reasoning, see People v. Topping
    Search
  22. People v. Washburn
    Search
  23. in the official Senate and House Reports. We decline to accord any significance to these statements. See McCaughn v. Hershey
    Search
  24. Ohio v. Kovacs
    Search
  25. U.S. Supreme Court Kelly v. Robinson
    Search
  26. Midlantic National Bank v. New
    Search
  27. Robinson v. McGuigan
    Search
  28. Pellegrino (Pellegrino v. Division
    Search
  29. Mastro Plastics Corp. v. NLRB
    Search
  30. United States v. Heirs
    Search
  31. Act. In Midlantic National Bank v. New
    Search
  32. See Younger v. Harris
    Search
  33. Parker v. United
    Search
  34. People v. Topping
    Search
  35. See McCaughn v. Hershey
    Search
  36. Ohio v. Kovacs
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales