Citation network
New York Vs. Class
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 25, 1986
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 106 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court New York v. ClassSearch
-
U.S. 106 (1986) New York v. ClassSearch
-
only in direct conjunction with the United States Constitution. 63 N.Y.2d at 493, 472 N.E.2d at 1010. Cf. Michigan v. LongSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
that it rests on state grounds. Page 475 U. S. 110 Michigan v. LongSearch
-
supra, at 463 U. S. 1042 , 463 U. S. 1044 . Accordingly, our holding in Michigan v. LongSearch
-
U.S. at 463 U. S. 1040 -1041. See also California v. CarneySearch
-
that, when statutory construction can resolve a case, courts should not decide constitutional issues. See Ashwander v. TVASearch
-
Peters v. NewSearch
-
S4.6) (1984) (emphasis added). In Delaware v. ProuseSearch
-
A citizen does not surrender all the protections of the Fourth Amendment by entering an automobile. See Delaware v. ProuseSearch
-
Almeida-Sanchez v. UnitedSearch
-
Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 389 U. S. 347 , 389 U. S. 360 (1967) (Harlan, J., concurring). See Oliver v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 364 , 428 U. S. 368 (1976). See also Cady v. DombrowskiSearch
-
diminished. This is especially true in the case of a driver who has committed a traffic violation. See Delaware v. ProuseSearch
-
See Cardwell v. LewisSearch
-
access to an area do not generate a reasonable expectation of privacy where none would otherwise exist. See Oliver v. UnitedSearch
-
N.Y.2d at 495, 472 N.E.2d at 1011. Cf. Delaware v. ProuseSearch
-
vehicle even though they lack any particularized reason for believing the driver possesses a weapon. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSearch
-
to a dangerous weapon and the benefit of the partial concealment provided by the car's exterior. See Pennsylvania v. MimmsSearch
-
Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
test generally means that searches must be conducted pursuant to a warrant backed by probable cause. See United States v. VentrescaSearch
-
police officers to justify warrantless searches based only on a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. See Terry v. OhioSearch
-
Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
U. S. 143 (1972). Such searches are permissible despite their substantial intrusiveness. See Terry v. OhioSearch
-
justify the intrusion if the balance is to tip in favor of the legality of the governmental intrusion. In Pennsylvania v. MimmsSearch
-
the seized individual in the commission of a traffic offense before requesting that he exit his vehicle. In Michigan v. SummersSearch
-
to search the house that the person seized was leaving when they came upon him. While the facts in Pennsylvania v. MimmsSearch
-
and Michigan v. SummersSearch
-
U. S. 703 (1983), the conclusion that the search here was permissible follows. As we recognized in Delaware v. ProuseSearch
-
issue of the intrusiveness of the government's action, United States v. PlaceSearch
-
the car away, to have impounded the car, and to have later conducted an inventory search thereof. Cf. South Dakota v. OppermanSearch
-
McKinney 1981), and could then have searched the passenger compartment at the time of arrest, cf. New York v. BeltonSearch
-
U. S. 454 (1981), or arrested respondent and searched the car after impounding it pursuant to the arrest, see Cady v. DombrowskiSearch
-
vehicle for a traffic infraction, the officer is entitled to inspect license and registration documents. See Delaware v. ProuseSearch
-
from the officer's efforts to observe this VIN once respondent's vehicle lawfully was stopped. Cf. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSearch
-
obstructing the VIN. In the absence of compliance with such a request, an arrest would have been lawful. Cf. People v. EllisSearch
-
the decision of the New York Court of Appeals does not rest on an adequate and independent state ground, see Michigan v. LongSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial