Citation network
Connolly Vs. Pbgc
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 26, 1986
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 211 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court Connolly v. PBGCSearch
-
U.S. 211 (1986) Connolly v. PensionSearch
-
Penn Central Transportation Co. v. NewSearch
-
U.S. at 467 U. S. 720 , quoting Nachman Corp. v. PensionSearch
-
and enjoining the PBGC from treating it in any other manner. Connolly v. PensionSearch
-
CD Cal.1976). The Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded for consideration of the constitutional issues. Connolly v. PensionSearch
-
a petition of mandamus on the issue, but their petition was denied by both the Ninth Circuit and this Court. Connolly v. WilliamsSearch
-
Connolly v. UnitedSearch
-
is violated whenever legislation requires one person to use his or her assets for the benefit of another. In Usery v. TurnerSearch
-
Norman v. BaltimoreSearch
-
or destroys existing contractual rights does not always transform the regulation into an illegal taking. Bowles v. WillinghamSearch
-
Omnia Commercial Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
on its face. This conclusion is not inconsistent with our prior Taking Clause cases. See, e.g., Ruckelshaus v. MonsantoSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Loretto v. TeleprompterSearch
-
Hodel v. VirginiaSearch
-
Kaiser Aetna v. UnitedSearch
-
PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSearch
-
Usery v. TurnerSearch
-
Elkhorn Mining Co., supra, at 428 U. S. 15 , 428 U. S. 16 . See Andrus v. AllardSearch
-
FHA v. TheSearch
-
Darlington, Inc., 358 U. S. 84 , 358 U. S. 91 (1958). See also Usery v. TurnerSearch
-
Armstrong v. UnitedSearch
-
Together with No. 84-1567, Woodward Sand Co., Inc. v. PensionSearch
-
is consistent with the result reached by every other court to have considered the issue. Keith Fulton & Sons, Inc. v. NewSearch
-
Board of Trustees of Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust Fund v. ThompsonSearch
-
Terson Co. v. BakerySearch
-
Washington Star Co. v. InternationalSearch
-
Textile Workers Pension Fund v. StandardSearch
-
Dye & Finishing Co., 725 F.2d 843 (CA2), cert. denied sub nom. Sibley, Lindsay & Curr Co. v. BakerySearch
-
Peick v. PensionSearch
-
Republic Industries, Inc. v. TeamstersSearch
-
Speckmann v. PaddockSearch
-
to guide the PBGC in the exercise of this authority under the Act. See J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Nachman Corp. v. PensionSearch
-
A. Gray & Co., supra, at 467 U. S. 733 (discussing Railroad Retirement Board v. AltonSearch
-
b)(1). See Nachman Corp. v. PensionSearch
-
gains can still ordinarily be used to increase benefits. It is also noteworthy that, as this Court held in NLRB v. AmaxSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Connolly v. PBGCSearch
-
Connolly v. PensionSearch
-
Court. Connolly v. WilliamsSearch
-
In Usery v. TurnerSearch
-
Ruckelshaus v. MonsantoSearch
-
See Andrus v. AllardSearch
-
Woodward Sand Co., Inc. v. PensionSearch
-
Keith Fulton & Sons, Inc. v. NewSearch
-
Sibley, Lindsay & Curr Co. v. BakerySearch
-
the Act. See J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Railroad Retirement Board v. AltonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial