Citation network
Malley Vs. Briggs
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 05, 1986
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 335 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court Malley v. BriggsSearch
-
U.S. 335 (1986) Malley v. BriggsSearch
-
standard of Harlow v. FitzgeraldSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
can point to a Page 475 U. S. 340 common law counterpart to the privilege he asserts. Tower v. GloverSearch
-
for false arrest are qualifiedly immune, Pierson v. RaySearch
-
as giving the officer the same absolute immunity enjoyed by the prosecutor. Cf. Imbler v. PachtmanSearch
-
shield abuses of office, but because any lesser degree of immunity could impair the judicial process itself. Briscoe v. LaHueSearch
-
standard in a suppression hearing, see United States v. LeonSearch
-
a remedy -- the person who in fact has done no wrong, and has been arrested for no reason, or a bad reason. See Owen v. CitySearch
-
U.S. at 457 U. S. 818 , n. 30 (quoting Butz v. EconomouSearch
-
Randall v. HenrySearch
-
Bell v. KeepersSearch
-
Finn v. FrinkSearch
-
W. Wait, Actions and Defenses 352-356 (1878). The same rule applied in the case of search warrants. See, e.g., Barker v. StetsonSearch
-
Carey v. SheetsSearch
-
As we stated in Monroe v. PapeSearch
-
of immunity, purporting to apply the standard of objective reasonableness for qualified immunity articulated in Harlow v. FitzgeraldSearch
-
Id. at 457 U. S. 815 , quoting Wood v. StricklandSearch
-
The Court quotes from United States v. PageSearch
-
Baker v. McCollanSearch
-
Leach v. ThreeSearch
-
of the King's Messengers, 19 How.St.Tr. 1001, 1027 (1765), quoted in United States v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. UnitedSearch
-
Steagald v. UnitedSearch
-
States, Page 475 U. S. 353 451 U. S. 204 , 451 U. S. 212 (1981). As we stated in Arkansas v. SandersSearch
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
often are used interchangeably in Court opinions. Shadwick v. CitySearch
-
In United States v. VentrescaSearch
-
In Jones v. UnitedSearch
-
a doubtful or marginal case, a search under a warrant may be sustainable where, without one, it would fall. In Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 333 U. S. 10 , and Chapman v. UnitedSearch
-
in judgment). If the magistrate has wholly abandoned his judicial role in the manner condemned in Lo-Ji Sales, Inc. v. NewSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Malley v. BriggsSearch
-
of Harlow v. FitzgeraldSearch
-
Cf. Imbler v. PachtmanSearch
-
See Owen v. CitySearch
-
Barker v. StetsonSearch
-
Wood v. StricklandSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial