Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

California Vs. Brown

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 27, 1986

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

30 entries 1 linked 29 unlinked
Show
  1. Delaware Vs. Prouse US Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1979
  2. U.S. 1301 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court California v. Brown
    Search
  3. U.S. 1301 (1986) California v. Brown
    Search
  4. to the United States Constitution. The court felt that this instruction was incompatible with our decisions in Lockett v. Ohio
    Search
  5. U. S. 586 (1978), and Eddings v. Oklahoma
    Search
  6. and the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom. It is consistent with JUSTICE STEVENS' observation in Gardner v. Florida
    Search
  7. grounds, and is therefore unreviewable by this Court. It is true that, prior to this Court's 1972 decision in Furman v. Georgia
    Search
  8. held that a jury instruction identical to the one at issue in this case violated the State Constitution. See People v. Bandhauer
    Search
  9. Cal.3d 609, 618-619, 463 P.2d 408, 416 (1970). After this Court's 1976 decision in Gregg v. Georgia
    Search
  10. Supreme Court revisited the question, treating it as a matter of federal, not state, constitutional law. See People v. Robertson
    Search
  11. Cal.3d 21, 56-59, 655 P.2d 279, 286-287 (1982). In People v. Easley
    Search
  12. People v. Lanphear
    Search
  13. U. S. 648 , 440 U. S. 653 (1979), quoting Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard
    Search
  14. supra, at 440 U. S. 653 , quoting Missouri ex rel. Southern R. Co. v. Mayfield
    Search
  15. In California v. Ramos
    Search
  16. does not, and indeed could not, contend that the California sentencing scheme violates the directive of Lockett v. Ohio
    Search
  17. See People v. Easley
    Search
  18. U.S. Supreme Court California v. Brown
    Search
  19. Lockett v. Ohio
    Search
  20. and Eddings v. Oklahoma
    Search
  21. Gardner v. Florida
    Search
  22. Furman v. Georgia
    Search
  23. the State Constitution. See People v. Bandhauer
    Search
  24. Gregg v. Georgia
    Search
  25. See People v. Robertson
    Search
  26. In People v. Easley
    Search
  27. People v. Lanphear
    Search
  28. Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard
    Search
  29. Southern R. Co. v. Mayfield
    Search
  30. of Lockett v. Ohio
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial