Citation network
Evans Vs. Jeff D.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 21, 1986
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Evans v. JeffSearch
-
D. - 475 U.S. 717 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court Evans v. JeffSearch
-
D., 475 U.S. 717 (1986) Evans v. JeffSearch
-
In Maher v. GagneSearch
-
by reducing the attractiveness of settlement. Of particular relevance in this regard is our recent decision in Marek v. ChesnySearch
-
U.S. at 473 U. S. 10 . To promote both settlement and civil rights, we implicitly acknowledged in Marek v. ChesnySearch
-
entire civil rights action, including any liability for fees and costs. In approving the package offer in Marek v. ChesnySearch
-
Id. at 473 U. S. 6 -7. See White v. NewSearch
-
Brief for Defendants in Support of Approval of Compromise in Jeff D. v. EvansSearch
-
a determination of costs, which ordinarily involve smaller outlays and are more susceptible of calculation, see Marek v. ChesnySearch
-
for determining attorney's fees, Page 475 U. S. 736 Hensley v. EckerhartSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
of Idaho Legal Aid. Brief for Plaintiffs in Support of Motion for Consideration of Costs and Attorney Fees in Jeff D. v. EvansSearch
-
As we held in Maher v. GagneSearch
-
award would benefit a legal services corporation justify a refusal to make an award. See New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. CareySearch
-
That precedent, Mendoza v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 623 F.2d 1338 (CA9 1980), like the Third Circuit decision in Prandini v. NationalSearch
-
to prevent attorneys from trading relief benefiting the class for a more generous fee for themselves. See Mendoza v. UnitedSearch
-
Prandini v. NationalSearch
-
the decision of the Ninth Circuit below is in accord with the rule prevailing in the Third Circuit, see Prandini v. NationalSearch
-
El Club Del Barrio, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
plaintiffs are free to waive fee awards as part of an overall settlement, at least in some circumstances, see Moore v. NationalSearch
-
Lazar v. PierceSearch
-
Gram v. BankSearch
-
Chicano Police Officer's Assn. v. StoverSearch
-
See Pasadena City Board of Education v. SpanglerSearch
-
United States v. UnitedSearch
-
Railway Employees v. WrightSearch
-
United States v. SwiftSearch
-
Cf. Firefighters v. StottsSearch
-
accords with the view held by the majority of the Courts of Appeals. See, e.g., Jonas v. StackSearch
-
Brown v. GeneralSearch
-
Cooper v. SingerSearch
-
White v. NewSearch
-
rev'd on other grounds, 455 U. S. 445 (1982). But cf. James v. HomeSearch
-
Construction Co. of Mobil Inc., 689 F.2d 1357, 1358-1359 (CA11 1982) (disagreeing with Smith v. SouthSearch
-
useful to plaintiffs as well as defendants. In her opinion concurring in the judgment in Moore v. NationalSearch
-
Rivera v. RiversideSearch
-
Cunningham v. CitySearch
-
Copeland v. MarshallSearch
-
Skoda v. FontaniSearch
-
recovery). Cf. Marek v. ChesnySearch
-
Grendel's Den, Inc. v. LarkinSearch
-
in fees and expenses for successful challenge to law zoning liquor establishments in Larkin v. Grendel'sSearch
-
Id. at 465 U. S. 902 , n.19. See Hensley v. EckerhartSearch
-
simultaneous negotiation in one Circuit by means of tacit agreements of this kind. See El Club Del Barrio, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
We believe, however, that, as a practical matter, the likelihood of this circumstance arising is remote. See Moore v. NationalSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial