Citation network
Diamond Vs. Charles
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 30, 1986
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 54 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court Diamond v. CharlesSearch
-
U.S. 54 (1986) Diamond v. CharlesSearch
-
Charles v. CareySearch
-
and 11(d). Charles v. CareySearch
-
of the other party. Gladstone, Realtors v. VillageSearch
-
Warth v. SeldinSearch
-
Valley Forge Christian College v. AmericansSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
between appellees and the State of Illinois. Cf. Princeton University v. SchmidSearch
-
who were charged with enforcing the Abortion Law because appellee faced possible criminal prosecution. See, e.g., Doe v. BoltonSearch
-
Linda R. S. v. RichardSearch
-
Leeke v. TimmermanSearch
-
U. S. 883 (1984). See also Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
U. S. 31 , 369 U. S. 33 (1962). Cf. Allen v. WrightSearch
-
is one of the quintessential functions of a State. Alfred L. Snapp & Son, Inc. v. PuertoSearch
-
identified in Sierra Club v. MortonSearch
-
fact. A physician has standing to challenge an abortion law that poses for him a threat of criminal prosecution. Doe v. BoltonSearch
-
Planned Parenthood of Central Mo. v. DanforthSearch
-
of other individuals Page 476 U. S. 66 who are unable to assert those rights themselves. See Singleton v. WulffSearch
-
Simon v. EasternSearch
-
Law, as written, be obeyed. Article III requires more than a desire to vindicate value interests. See United States v. SCRAPSearch
-
to adduce factual support renders him incapable of maintaining this appeal in his capacity as a parent. See Bender v. WilliamsportSearch
-
State may invoke the power of the courts when those regulatory measures are subject to challenge. Page 476 U. S. 68 V FinallySearch
-
Although intervenors are considered parties entitled, among other things, to seek review by this Court, Mine Workers v. Eagle-PicherSearch
-
the intervenor that he fulfills the requirements of Art. III. See id. at 325 U. S. 339 . See also Bryant v. YellenSearch
-
See Donaldson v. UnitedSearch
-
Gladstone, Realtors v. VillageSearch
-
injury 'fairly can be traced to the challenged action' and 'is likely to be redressed by a favorable decision,' Simon v. EasternSearch
-
over the Governor's veto. Substantial portions of it already have been held to be unconstitutional. See, e.g., Wynn v. ScottSearch
-
F.Supp. 1302 (ND Ill.1978), aff'd sub nom Wynn v. CareySearch
-
A suit against a state officer in his official capacity is, of course, a suit against the State. See Kentucky v. GrahamSearch
-
U. S. 165 -166 (1985). The District Court certified a defendant class of State's Attorneys. Charles v. CareySearch
-
as it appeared prior to the 1984 amendment. See Charles v. DaleySearch
-
n 8, supra, but the Court of Appeals assessed its constitutionality on the version quoted above. See Charles v. DaleySearch
-
Law had been preliminarily enjoined under a separate opinion by the District Court following remand. See Charles v. CareySearch
-
version of the Abortion Law, the amended sections were subject to a temporary restraining order. See Keith v. DaleySearch
-
the constitutionality of the 1984 amendments and rejected challenges of mootness based on those amendments. Charles v. DaleySearch
-
the invasion of which may confer standing. In such a case, the requirements of Art. III may be met. See Simon v. EasternSearch
-
requires an interest in excess of that required for standing), cert. pending sub nom. Save the Dunes Council, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
States, No. 85-426, with Southern Christian Leadership Conference v. KelleySearch
-
equating interest necessary to intervene with interest necessary to confer standing), and United States v. AmericanSearch
-
an interest in the outcome of the suit different from that of the public as a whole), with Sagebush Rebellion, Inc. v. WattSearch
-
resolving intervention questions without reference to standing doctrine), and Planned Parenthood of Minnesota, Inc. v. CitizensSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial