Citation network
Turner Vs. Murray
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 30, 1986
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 28 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court Turner v. MurraySearch
-
U.S. 28 (1986) Turner v. MurraySearch
-
that risk, being especially serious in view of the finality of the death sentence, could have been minimized. Ristaino v. RossSearch
-
Turner v. CommonwealthSearch
-
jurors on racial prejudice. The Virginia Supreme Court rejected this argument. Relying on our decision in Ristaino v. RossSearch
-
decision as a matter of policy, is not constitutionally objectionable in the absence of factors akin to those in Ham v. SouthSearch
-
affirmed the District Court's denial of habeas corpus relief for Page 476 U. S. 33 petitioner. Turner v. BassSearch
-
U. S. 320 , 472 U. S. 340 , n. 7 (1985) (quoting Zant v. StephensSearch
-
the jury greater discretion than other systems which we have upheld against constitutional challenge. See, e.g., Jurek v. TexasSearch
-
be free to weigh relevant mitigating evidence before deciding whether to impose the death penalty, see, e.g., Eddings v. OklahomaSearch
-
questions on the subject, including the decision whether to question the venire individually or collectively. See Ham v. SouthSearch
-
Whether the trial judge was referring to this Court's decision in Ristaino v. RossSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
are white are executed with disproportionate frequency, the court responded by quoting our opinion in Rosales-Lopez v. UnitedSearch
-
a blind belief that the facts presented in that case could not evoke racial prejudice. As we stated in Rosales-Lopez v. UnitedSearch
-
thus, he does not say that, in a case like Ham v. SouthSearch
-
penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. GeorgiaSearch
-
concerning possible racial bias is triggered whenever a violent interracial crime has been committed. See Ross v. MassachusettsSearch
-
Ham v. SouthSearch
-
information with which to evaluate members of the venire. As JUSTICE WHITE noted for the Court in Rosales-Lopez v. UnitedSearch
-
may require a judge to ask jurors whether they entertain any racial prejudice. Aldridge v. UnitedSearch
-
Ham v. SouthSearch
-
focus thus belongs on whether there is a likelihood of bias, and not on what flows from that bias. In Ham v. SouthSearch
-
joins, concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. For the reasons stated in my opinion in Ross v. MassachusettsSearch
-
to choose whether to make an inquiry concerning such possible prejudice. This Court did not identify in Ristaino v. RossSearch
-
without affording any real protection beyond that provided by our decisions in Ham v. SouthSearch
-
Carolina, 409 U. S. 524 (1973), and Ristaino v. RossSearch
-
case impartially nevertheless are racially biased. Such a presumption is flatly contrary to our decisions in Ristaino v. RossSearch
-
supra, and Rosales-Lopez v. UnitedSearch
-
an impartial jury would not be seated. Ristaino v. RossSearch
-
law vests the trial judge with the responsibility to conduct voir dire examination of prospective jurors. Turner v. CommonwealthSearch
-
but the studies included no statistics concerning administration of the death penalty in Virginia. See Turner v. CommonwealthSearch
-
crime, raised a constitutionally significant likelihood that racial prejudice would taint the proceedings. Ristaino v. RossSearch
-
racial grounds. It is not easy to reconcile the Court's holding today with the principles announced and applied in Ham v. SouthSearch
-
Carolina, Ristaino v. RossSearch
-
and Rosales-Lopez v. UnitedSearch
-
petitioner to death on February 6, 1980. The Supreme Court of Virginia affirmed the convictions and sentences. Turner v. CommonwealthSearch
-
denied relief, and the Supreme Court of Virginia denied review. We denied a petition for a writ of certiorari. Turner v. MorrisSearch
-
entered May 23, 1984, the District Court denied the writ. The Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed. Turner v. BassSearch
-
Rosales-Lopez v. UnitedSearch
-
and credibility by relying on their own evaluations of demeanor evidence and of responses to questions. See Ristaino v. RossSearch
-
U. S. 589 , 424 U. S. 595 (1976), quoting Rideau v. LouisianaSearch
-
As the facts of Ristaino v. RossSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Turner v. MurraySearch
-
Turner v. BassSearch
-
Jurek v. TexasSearch
-
Eddings v. OklahomaSearch
-
See Ham v. SouthSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial