Citation network
Lockhart Vs. Mccree
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 05, 1986
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 162 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court Lockhart v. McCreeSearch
-
U.S. 162 (1986) Lockhart v. McCreeSearch
-
under the principles of Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
Respondent's view of jury impartiality is both illogical and impractical. Neither Witherspoon, supra, nor Adams v. TexasSearch
-
of the Court. In this case, we address the question left open by our decision nearly 18 years ago in Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
Bumper v. NorthSearch
-
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, the District Court ruled in McCree's favor and granted habeas relief Grigsby v. MabrySearch
-
F.Supp. 1273 (1983). A sharply divided Eighth Circuit affirmed, Grigsby v. MabrySearch
-
en banc), creating a conflict with recent decisions of the Fourth, Fifth, Seventh, and Eleventh Circuits. See Keeten v. GarrisonSearch
-
Smith v. BalkcomSearch
-
F.2d 573, 576-578 (CA5 1981), modified on other grounds, 671 F.2d 858, cert. denied sub nom. Tison v. ArizonaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Spinkellink v. WainwrightSearch
-
Clark v. FikeSearch
-
and Corn v. ZantSearch
-
a) (1977). In accordance with Arkansas law, see Neal v. StateSearch
-
McCree's punishment at life imprisonment without parole. McCree's conviction was affirmed on direct appeal, McCree v. StateSearch
-
Grigsby v. MabrySearch
-
F.2d 525 (1980). The District Court denied the remainder of McCree's petition, and the Eighth Circuit affirmed. McCree v. HousewrightSearch
-
juries. Grigsby v. MabrySearch
-
cause violated McCree's constitutional right to a jury selected from a fair cross-section of the community. Grigsby v. MabrySearch
-
We have serious doubts about the value of these studies in predicting the behavior of actual jurors. See Grigsby v. MabrySearch
-
under the Sixth Amendment, as applied to the States via incorporation through the Fourteenth Amendment, see Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
petit juries, as opposed to jury panels or venires, to reflect the composition of the community at large. See Duren v. MissouriSearch
-
Taylor v. LouisianaSearch
-
Batson v. KentuckySearch
-
the Court of Appeals itself acknowledged for many years prior to its decision in the instant case. See United States v. ChildressSearch
-
Pope v. UnitedSearch
-
Amendment or the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, have involved such groups as blacks, see Peters v. KiffSearch
-
and Mexican-Americans, see Castaneda v. PartidaSearch
-
from jury service without contravening any of the basic objectives of the fair cross-section requirement. See Lockett v. OhioSearch
-
jurors who served at his trial were impartial, as that term was defined by this Court in cases such as Irvin v. DowdSearch
-
and Reynolds v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 98 U. S. 145 (1879). He does not claim that pretrial publicity, see Rideau v. LouisianaSearch
-
U. S. 723 (1963), ex parte communications, see Remmer v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 347 U. S. 227 (1954), or other undue influence, see Estes v. TexasSearch
-
Smith v. PhillipsSearch
-
favorable to the challenger. McCree argues, however, that this Court's decisions in Witherspoon and Adams v. TexasSearch
-
may not entrust the determination of whether a man is innocent or guilty to a tribunal 'organized to convict.' Fay v. NewSearch
-
See Tumey v. OhioSearch
-
U.S. at 391 U. S. 520 -521 (footnotes omitted). In Adams v. TexasSearch
-
Rector v. StateSearch
-
sentencing plan which provided that the same jury must sit in both phases of a bifurcated capital murder trial, Gregg v. GeorgiaSearch
-
may properly be excluded from the penalty phase of the deliberations under Witherspoon, Adams, and Wainwright v. WittSearch
-
Jurek v. TexasSearch
-
In Wainwright v. WittSearch
-
Id. at 469 U. S. 433 , quoting Adams v. TexasSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial