Citation network
Poland Vs. Arizona
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 05, 1986
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 147 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court Poland v. ArizonaSearch
-
U.S. 147 (1986) Poland v. ArizonaSearch
-
the defendant is convicted again, he may constitutionally be subjected to whatever punishment is lawful. Bullington v. MissouriSearch
-
petitioners. Bullington v. MissouriSearch
-
trial. The Arizona Supreme Court agreed that the jury's verdict was tainted, necessitating reversal and retrial. State v. PolandSearch
-
court explained that this aggravating circumstance is not limited to situations involving contract killings, see State v. ClarkSearch
-
of the death penalty. Cf. Bullington v. MissouriSearch
-
State v. PolandSearch
-
Patrick), 144 Ariz. 388, 404, 698 P.2d 183, 199 (1985). Accord, State v. PolandSearch
-
circumstance with respect to Patrick Poland. State v. PolandSearch
-
State v. PolandSearch
-
Jeopardy Clause. 474 U.S. 816 (1985). We hold that it did not. Page 476 U. S. 152 II In Bullington v. MissouriSearch
-
Id. at 451 U. S. 442 (quoting North Carolina v. PearceSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
ibid. (quoting Burks v. UnitedSearch
-
that the rationale of Bullington applies to the Arizona capital sentencing scheme at issue in this case. Arizona v. RumseySearch
-
barring a second death sentence proceeding. Arizona v. RumseySearch
-
United States v. ScottSearch
-
U. S. 82 , 437 U. S. 91 (1978) (quoting Green v. UnitedSearch
-
Together with No. 85-5024, Poland v. ArizonaSearch
-
Bullington, 451 U.S. at 443 (quoting Green v. UnitedSearch
-
Bullington, supra, at 451 U. S. 442 -443 (quoting Burks v. UnitedSearch
-
sentencer should be seen as rendering a series of miniverdicts on each aggravating circumstance. See also Arizona v. RumseySearch
-
JUSTICE BRENNAN and JUSTICE BLACKMUN join, dissenting. There is one difference between these cases and Arizona v. RumseySearch
-
procedure is equivalent to a trial for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause, under the doctrine of Bullington v. MissouriSearch
-
petitioners never received sentences of life imprisonment. Yet the majority fails to recognize the teaching of Burks v. UnitedSearch
-
an error of law, so, too, did the reversal of petitioners' death sentences. The analogy, first drawn in Bullington v. MissouriSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Poland v. ArizonaSearch
-
Bullington v. MissouriSearch
-
State v. ClarkSearch
-
Cf. Bullington v. MissouriSearch
-
Patrick Poland. State v. PolandSearch
-
II In Bullington v. MissouriSearch
-
Burks v. UnitedSearch
-
Green v. UnitedSearch
-
and Arizona v. RumseySearch
-
of Bullington v. MissouriSearch
-
of Burks v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial