Citation network
Smalis Vs. Pennsylvania
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 05, 1986
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 140 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court Smalis v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
U.S. 140 (1986) Smalis v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
sustain a guilty verdict constitutes an acquittal for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause. See, e.g., United States v. MartinSearch
-
Burks v. UnitedSearch
-
Sanabria v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. ScottSearch
-
Martin Linen. The Commonwealth appealed to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, which reversed. Commonwealth v. ZollerSearch
-
The court relied heavily on the statement in United States v. ScottSearch
-
Commonwealth v. ZollerSearch
-
at this time, hold that such a ruling is an acquittal under the Double Jeopardy Clause. See, e.g., United States v. MartinSearch
-
The Commonwealth argues that its appeal is nonetheless permissible under Justices of Boston Municipal Court v. LydonSearch
-
to postacquittal factfinding proceedings going to guilt or innocence violates the Double Jeopardy Clause. Arizona v. RumseySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Court, petitioners' case was consolidated with another case presenting the same double jeopardy issue, Commonwealth v. ZollerSearch
-
Harris v. WashingtonSearch
-
U. S. 55 (1971). As explained in Abney v. UnitedSearch
-
Burks v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. at 437 U. S. 98 (quoting id. at 437 U. S. 106 (BRENNAN, J., dissenting)). Accord, Sanabria v. UnitedSearch
-
The Court held that the Double Jeopardy Clause barred a second sentencing hearing. It distinguished United States v. WilsonSearch
-
standard which the Superior Court quoted from Martin Linen was first articulated in United States v. JenkinsSearch
-
U. S. 358 , 420 U. S. 370 (1975), does not detract from its authority. United States v. ScottSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Smalis v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
United States v. MartinSearch
-
Justices of Boston Municipal Court v. LydonSearch
-
the Double Jeopardy Clause. Arizona v. RumseySearch
-
Abney v. UnitedSearch
-
Accord, Sanabria v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. WilsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial