Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Brock Vs. Pierce County

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 19, 1986

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

38 entries 1 linked 37 unlinked
Show
  1. Mohasco Corp. Vs. Silver US Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1980
  2. Brock v. Pierce
    Search
  3. County - 476 U.S. 253 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court Brock v. Pierce
    Search
  4. County, 476 U.S. 253 (1986) Brock v. Pierce
    Search
  5. deadline, courts should not assume that Congress intended that the agency lose its power to act. Mohasco Corp. v. Silver
    Search
  6. finding no specific instances of prejudice. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed. Pierce County v. United
    Search
  7. States, By and Through Dept. of Labor, 759 F.2d 1398 (1985). That court had previously decided, in City of Edmonds v. United
    Search
  8. St. Regis Mohawk Tribe, New York v. Brock
    Search
  9. ibid. (quoting Consumer Product Safety Comm'n v. GTE
    Search
  10. St. Regis Mohawk Tribe, supra, at 41 (quoting Fort Worth National Corp. v. Federal
    Search
  11. United States v. Nashville
    Search
  12. C. & St. L. R. Co., 118 U. S. 120 , 118 U. S. 125 (1886). See also Guaranty Trust Co. v. United
    Search
  13. the Fort Worth National line of precedent as being inconsistent with this Court's decision in Mohasco Corp. v. Silver
    Search
  14. the statutory language and other legislative history, they provide evidence of Congress' intent. Grove City College v. Bell
    Search
  15. subgrantees, and employees to voice grievances and receive a prompt resolution. See St. Regis Mohawk Tribe, New York v. Brock
    Search
  16. Milwaukee County v. Donovan
    Search
  17. City of St. Louis v. United
    Search
  18. Lehigh Valley Manpower Program v. Donovan
    Search
  19. National Cable Television Assn., Inc. v. Copyright
    Search
  20. Marshall v. Local
    Search
  21. Moreover, nothing in CETA appears to bar an action to enforce the 120-day deadline. Cf. CETA Workers Organizing Comm. v. City
    Search
  22. under the APA to the same extent as a complainant. Cf. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp
    Search
  23. Iaff, Afl-Cio V. City
    Search
  24. Kolman v. Milwaukee
    Search
  25. U.S. Supreme Court Brock v. Pierce
    Search
  26. Pierce County v. United
    Search
  27. City of Edmonds v. United
    Search
  28. Consumer Product Safety Comm'n v. GTE
    Search
  29. Fort Worth National Corp. v. Federal
    Search
  30. Guaranty Trust Co. v. United
    Search
  31. Grove City College v. Bell
    Search
  32. See St. Regis Mohawk Tribe, New York v. Brock
    Search
  33. Lehigh Valley Manpower Program v. Donovan
    Search
  34. National Cable Television Assn., Inc. v. Copyright
    Search
  35. Cf. CETA Workers Organizing Comm. v. City
    Search
  36. Cf. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp
    Search
  37. Iaff, Afl-Cio V. City
    Search
  38. Stanley v. Schwalby
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial