Citation network
ila Vs. Davis
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 27, 1986
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 380 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court ILA v. DavisSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U.S. 380 (1986) International Longshoremen's Association, AFL-CIO v. DavisSearch
-
whether the conduct at issue was arguably protected or prohibited by the NLRA, San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSearch
-
JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court. The opinion in San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSearch
-
exception to federal preemption of state jurisdiction of labor-related disputes. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSearch
-
this dispute, although somewhat labor-related, is, at most, only of 'peripheral concern' to the NLRB. See, e.g., Linn v. UnitedSearch
-
state law. Nor do we review federal issues that can have no effect on the state court's judgment. See, e.g., Zacchini v. Scripps-HowardSearch
-
inquiry into the sufficiency of the asserted state ground, however, is one that we undertake ourselves. See Michigan v. LongSearch
-
federal law in a particular area that Congress has the authority to regulate under the Constitution. See, e.g., Kalb v. FeuersteinSearch
-
U. S. 68 , 470 U. S. 75 (1985) (citing Herb v. PitcairnSearch
-
Enterprise Irrigation District v. FarmersSearch
-
foreclosure of the state court's very jurisdiction to adjudicate. B The Court's opinion in Garner v. TeamstersSearch
-
Id. at 359 U. S. 245 . In Construction Laborers v. CurrySearch
-
Id. at 371 U. S. 548 (citations omitted). See also Belknap, Inc. v. HaleSearch
-
NLRA, Congress intended for the Board generally to exercise exclusive jurisdiction in this area. See, e.g., Journeymen v. BordenSearch
-
Liner v. JafcoSearch
-
Linn v. PlantSearch
-
Motor Coach Employees Page 476 U. S. 392 v. LockridgeSearch
-
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. CarpentersSearch
-
Brown v. HotelSearch
-
Wisconsin Dept. of Industry, Labor and Human Relations v. GouldSearch
-
we have identified claims that fall within one or both these articulated exceptions. See, e.g., Belknap, Inc. v. HaleSearch
-
Construction Workers v. LaburnumSearch
-
by the courts or the Board. Marine Engineers v. InterlakeSearch
-
Brief for Appellant 16 (quoting Operating Engineers v. JonesSearch
-
Hanna Mining Co. v. MarineSearch
-
Florida Power & Light Co. v. ElectricalSearch
-
Workers, 417 U. S. 790 , 417 U. S. 812 (1974). See also Operating Engineers v. JonesSearch
-
Beasley v. FoodSearch
-
See, e.g., Parker-Robb Chevrolet, Inc., 262 N.L.R.B. 402 (1982), aff'd, Automobile Salesmen's Union Local 1095 v. NLRBSearch
-
Consolidated Theatres, Inc. v. TheatricalSearch
-
So.2d at 1216, n. 1. See also Powell v. PhoenixSearch
-
where the injured party has no means of bringing the dispute before the Board. See Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. CarpentersSearch
-
U. S. 180 (1978). See also Motor Coach Employees v. LockridgeSearch
-
Longshoremen v. AriadneSearch
-
Our reasoning and decision here are supported by this Court's decision in Kalb v. FeuersteinSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial