Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Crane Vs. Kentucky

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 09, 1986

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

32 entries 6 linked 26 unlinked
Show
  1. Miller Vs. Fenton US Supreme Court · Dec 03, 1985
  2. Lego Vs. Twomey US Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1972
  3. Davis Vs. Alaska US Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1974
  4. California Vs. Trombetta US Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1984
    Relied / Followed
  5. Grannis Vs. Ordean US Supreme Court · Jun 08, 1914
  6. United States Vs. Cronic US Supreme Court · May 14, 1984
  7. U.S. 683 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court Crane v. Kentucky
    Search
  8. U.S. 683 (1986) Crane v. Kentucky
    Search
  9. of the Kentucky Supreme Court is directly at odds with language in several of this Court's opinions, see, e.g., Lego v. Twomey
    Search
  10. and because it conflicts with the decisions of every other state court to have confronted the issue, see, e.g., Beaver v. State
    Search
  11. Palmes v. State
    Search
  12. deprived petitioner of his fundamental constitutional right to a fair opportunity to present a defense. California v. Trombetta
    Search
  13. U. S. 538 , 385 U. S. 543 -544 (1967). See generally Jackson v. Denno
    Search
  14. to challenge the confession's reliability during the course of the trial. Ibid. To the same effect was Lego v. Twomey
    Search
  15. question most, but not all, States assign to the trial judge alone to resolve. Page 476 U. S. 689 See Jackson v. Denno
    Search
  16. Delaware v. Van
    Search
  17. interests of fairness and reliability -- even if the defendant would prefer to see that evidence admitted. Chambers v. Mississippi
    Search
  18. U. S. 302 -303. Whether rooted directly in the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, Chambers v. Mississippi
    Search
  19. supra, or in the Compulsory Process or Confrontation clauses of the Sixth Amendment, Washington v. Texas
    Search
  20. Strickland v. Washington
    Search
  21. U. S. 648 , 466 U. S. 656 (1984). See also Washington v. Texas
    Search
  22. Delaware v. Van
    Search
  23. U.S. Supreme Court Crane v. Kentucky
    Search
  24. Beaver v. State
    Search
  25. Jackson v. Denno
    Search
  26. See Jackson v. Denno
    Search
  27. the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, Chambers v. Mississippi
    Search
  28. of the Sixth Amendment, Washington v. Texas
    Search
  29. Strickland v. Washington
    Search
  30. Washington v. Texas
    Search
  31. Sims v. Georgia
    Search
  32. Chambers v. Mississippi
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial