Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Dion

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 11, 1986

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

37 entries 6 linked 31 unlinked
Show
  1. Rosebud Sioux Tribe Vs. Kneip US Supreme Court · Apr 04, 1977
  2. Andrus Vs. Allard US Supreme Court · Nov 27, 1979
  3. Antoine Vs. Washington US Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1975
  4. Goldwater Vs. Carter US Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1979
    Relied / Followed
  5. Lone Wolf Vs. Hitchcock US Supreme Court · Jan 05, 1903
    Relied / Followed
  6. Mattz Vs. Arnett US Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1973
  7. U.S. 734 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Dion
    Search
  8. U.S. 734 (1986) United States v. Dion
    Search
  9. in the years to come. The area thus reserved for the Tribe was a legally constituted Indian reservation, see Minnesota v. Hitchcock
    Search
  10. Wood v. Jameson
    Search
  11. Law 449 (1982) (hereinafter Cohen). These rights need not be expressly mentioned in the treaty. See Menominee Tribe v. United
    Search
  12. Alaska Pacific Fisheries v. United
    Search
  13. with a foreign power. Fong Yue Ting v. United
    Search
  14. Goldwater v. Carter
    Search
  15. U. S. 996 (1979). This Court applied that rule to congressional abrogation of Indian treaties in Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock
    Search
  16. see also Page 476 U. S. 739 United States v. Santa
    Search
  17. Washington v. Washington
    Search
  18. Menominee Tribe v. United
    Search
  19. Id. at 391 U. S. 413 , quoting Pigeon River Co. v. Cox
    Search
  20. of its intent to abrogate treaty rights. See Leavenworth, L., & G. R. Co. v. United
    Search
  21. U. S. 584 , 430 U. S. 587 (1977), quoting Mattz v. Arnett
    Search
  22. for the purpose of ensuring legislative accountability for the abrogation of treaty rights, cf. Seminole Nation v. United
    Search
  23. that the Eagle Protection Act, if read to abrogate Indian treaty rights, invades religious freedom. Cf. United States v. Abeyta
    Search
  24. Such treaty rights can be asserted by Dion as an individual member of the Tribe. See United States v. Winaus
    Search
  25. Kimball v. Callahan
    Search
  26. United States v. Felter
    Search
  27. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Dion
    Search
  28. Minnesota v. Hitchcock
    Search
  29. See Menominee Tribe v. United
    Search
  30. Fong Yue Ting v. United
    Search
  31. United States v. Santa
    Search
  32. Pigeon River Co. v. Cox
    Search
  33. See Leavenworth, L., & G. R. Co. v. United
    Search
  34. Seminole Nation v. United
    Search
  35. Cf. United States v. Abeyta
    Search
  36. of the Tribe. See United States v. Winaus
    Search
  37. United States v. Felter
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial