Citation network
Bowen Vs. Roy
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 11, 1986
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 693 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court Bowen v. RoySearch
-
U.S. 693 (1986) Bowen v. RoySearch
-
of the number. See Roy v. CohenSearch
-
Id. at 612-613. Citing our decision in United States v. LeeSearch
-
conditions and terms of dealings with the Government. Not all burdens on religion are unconstitutional. See Reynolds v. UnitedSearch
-
benefit by a uniformly applicable statute does not constitute infringement of religious liberty. In Hamilton v. RegentsSearch
-
of certain activity with religious significance was involved. Page 476 U. S. 705 In West Virginia Bd. of Ed. v. BarnetteSearch
-
take advantage of its opportunities may not, on ground of conscience, refuse compliance with such conditions. Hamilton v. RegentsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
contained in these two cases was emphasized by JUSTICE BRENNAN in his concurring opinion in Abington School District v. SchemppSearch
-
in rejecting a Free Exercise challenge in Bob Jones University v. UnitedSearch
-
A governmental burden on religious liberty is not insulated from review simply because it is indirect, Thomas v. ReviewSearch
-
Board of Indiana Employment Security Div., 450 U. S. 707 , 450 U. S. 717 -718 (1981) (citing Sherbert v. VernerSearch
-
avoid any appearance of favoring religious over nonreligious applicants. The test applied in cases like Wisconsin v. YoderSearch
-
See Brief for Petitioner 15, and Brief for American Jewish Congress as Amicus Curiae 11, in Thomas v. ReviewSearch
-
United States v. LeeSearch
-
Cf. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSearch
-
Cf. Follett v. TownSearch
-
Cf. NLRB v. CatholicSearch
-
Cf. Prince v. MassachusettsSearch
-
Cox v. NewSearch
-
Pierce v. SocietySearch
-
Reynolds v. UnitedSearch
-
Gilette v. UnitedSearch
-
West Virginia Bd. of Ed. v. BarnetteSearch
-
Concurring in McGowan v. MarylandSearch
-
In Braunfeld v. BrownSearch
-
In Wisconsin v. YoderSearch
-
religious beliefs such as appellees' would not violate the First Amendment's Establishment Clause. See Sherbert v. VernerSearch
-
requirement that appellees themselves supply a social security number for Little Bird of the Snow. Cf. Sherbert v. VernerSearch
-
Government by themselves providing their daughter's social security number on benefit applications. Cf. United States v. LeeSearch
-
Thomas v. ReviewSearch
-
Roy v. CohenSearch
-
nothing more than a straightforward application of Page 476 U. S. 716 Sherbert, Thomas, and Wisconsin v. YoderSearch
-
narrow view of Sherbert and Thomas. Compare post at 476 U. S. 722 , n. 17, with Goldman v. WeinbergerSearch
-
See Roy v. CohenSearch
-
In Thomas v. ReviewSearch
-
Bd. of Indiana Employment Security Div., 450 U. S. 707 (1981), and Sherbert v. VernerSearch
-
was necessary to prevent the treatment of religious claims less favorably than other claims. See United States v. LeeSearch
-
See Rescue Army v. MunicipalSearch
-
Coffman v. BreezeSearch
-
Liverpool, New York and Philadelphia S.S. Co. v. CommissionersSearch
-
See Bender v. WilliamsportSearch
-
Minnick v. CaliforniaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial