Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Lyng Vs. Payne

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 17, 1986

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

36 entries 3 linked 33 unlinked
Show
  1. Federal Crop Ins. Corp Vs. Merrill US Supreme Court · Nov 10, 1947
  2. Udall Vs. Tallman US Supreme Court · Mar 01, 1965
  3. Schweiker Vs. Hansen US Supreme Court · Apr 06, 1981
  4. U.S. 926 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court Lyng v. Payne
    Search
  5. U.S. 926 (1986) Lyng v. Payne
    Search
  6. Farmers Home Administration (FmHA) officials effectively cease processing loan applications. See generally Berends v. Butz
    Search
  7. Ibid. The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed, but on different grounds. Payne v. Block
    Search
  8. for certiorari, vacated the judgment below, and remanded for reconsideration in light of our decision in Heckler v. Community
    Search
  9. Health Services of Crawford County, Inc., 467 U. S. 51 (1984). Block v. Payne
    Search
  10. on the agency's failure to follow its own regulations, adhered to its prior views and reinstated its decision. Block v. Payne
    Search
  11. questions about a federal court's Page 476 U. S. 935 remedial powers, we again granted certiorari. Block v. Payne
    Search
  12. Heckler v. Community
    Search
  13. INS Page 476 U. S. 936 v. Hibi
    Search
  14. U. S. 5 , 414 U. S. 8 -9 (1973) (per curiam). See also Heckler v. Community
    Search
  15. of the cause of action, unless the plaintiff succeeds in proving all the elements of common law estoppel. Cf. Honda v. Clark
    Search
  16. clear at least three substantial hurdles. At the outset, not all agency publications are of binding force, Schweiker v. Hansen
    Search
  17. is appropriate when the allegedly aggrieved party has failed entirely to present its claim to the agency. Cf. Mathews v. Eldridge
    Search
  18. proposition that an agency's construction of its own regulations is entitled to substantial deference. United States v. Larionoff
    Search
  19. respect to disasters declared prior to the date the new law came into force. See Emergency Disaster Loan Assn., Inc. v. Block
    Search
  20. a legitimate claim of entitlement protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fifth or Fourteenth Amendment. Walters v. National
    Search
  21. Payne v. Block
    Search
  22. was consistent with administration policy concerning other programs authorized by Congress at that time. See Train v. City
    Search
  23. Berends v. Butz
    Search
  24. Cf. Young v. Community
    Search
  25. Train v. City
    Search
  26. by the Court of Appeals in 1983 and remanding for further consideration in the light of our decision in Heckler v. Community
    Search
  27. Health Services, Inc., 467 U. S. 51 (1984). See Block v. Payne
    Search
  28. U.S. Supreme Court Lyng v. Payne
    Search
  29. Block v. Payne
    Search
  30. Cf. Honda v. Clark
    Search
  31. Cf. Mathews v. Eldridge
    Search
  32. United States v. Larionoff
    Search
  33. See Emergency Disaster Loan Assn., Inc. v. Block
    Search
  34. Fourteenth Amendment. Walters v. National
    Search
  35. See Train v. City
    Search
  36. See Block v. Payne
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial