Citation network
Darden Vs. Wainwright
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 23, 1986
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 168 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court Darden v. WainwrightSearch
-
U.S. 168 (1986) Darden v. WainwrightSearch
-
in its entirety, shows that the trial court's decision to exclude the juror involved here was proper. Wainwright v. WittSearch
-
phase of the trial, petitioner failed to satisfy the first part of the two-part test set forth in Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
i) whether the exclusion for cause of a member of the venire violated the principles announced in Wainwright v. WittSearch
-
Darden v. StateSearch
-
federal habeas corpus relief, raising the same claims he raises here. The District Court denied the petition. Darden v. WainwrightSearch
-
F.Supp. 947 (MD Fla.1981). A divided panel of the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed. Darden v. WainwrightSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
on that claim, vacated the Court of Appeals' judgment, and remanded for reconsideration in light of Wainwright v. WittSearch
-
contends that one member of the venire, Mr. Murphy, was excluded improperly under the test enunciated in Wainwright v. WittSearch
-
U. S. 412 (1985). That case modified this Court's opinion in Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
U.S. at 469 U. S. 424 , quoting Adams v. TexasSearch
-
implicate other specific rights of the accused, such as the right to counsel or the right to remain silent. See Darden v. WainwrightSearch
-
content was invited by, or was responsive to, the opening summation of the defense. As we explained in United States v. YoungSearch
-
Page 477 U. S. 184 v. PetitionerSearch
-
at the sentencing phase of trial. That claim must be evaluated against the two-part test announced in Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
Ibid., quoting Michel v. LouisianaSearch
-
Proceedings 209. Petitioner had, for example, previously been convicted of assault with intent to commit rape. Darden v. StateSearch
-
U.S. at 466 U. S. 689 , quoting Michel v. LouisianaSearch
-
for certiorari only on that issue, and vacated and remanded the case for reconsideration in light of Wainwright v. WittSearch
-
maintains that the comments violated the requirement of reliability in the sentencing process articulated in Caldwell v. MississippiSearch
-
death, the issues now raised in the petition for certiorari have been considered by this Court four times, see Darden v. FloridaSearch
-
Wainwright v. DardenSearch
-
penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Lutwak v. UnitedSearch
-
Bruton v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 123 , 391 U. S. 135 (1968), this Court has stressed repeatedly in the decade since Gregg v. GeorgiaSearch
-
defense counsel in ruling that an attorney's actions did not deprive his client of any constitutional right, see Nix v. WhitesideSearch
-
Berger v. UnitedSearch
-
B The Court, see ante at 477 U. S. 181 , relies on the standard established in Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSearch
-
Berger v. UnitedSearch
-
Ante at 477 U. S. 182 , citing United States v. YoungSearch
-
test set out in Caldwell v. MississippiSearch
-
error undermines its confidence in the outcome of the proceeding to an unacceptable degree. See, e.g., United States v. YoungSearch
-
Kotteakos v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Moore v. IllinoisSearch
-
long been condemned by this Court, precisely because they can result in unreliable identifications. See, e.g., Stovall v. DennoSearch
-
Simmons v. UnitedSearch
-
exclusion for cause of a member of the venire who was qualified to serve under this Court's decisions in Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
U. S. 510 (1968), and Wainwright v. WittSearch
-
U. S. 412 (1985). In Davis v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Adams v. TexasSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Darden v. WainwrightSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial