Citation network
Celotex Corp. Vs. Catrett
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 25, 1986
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 317 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court Celotex Corp. v. CatrettSearch
-
U.S. 317 (1986) Celotex Corp. v. CatrettSearch
-
its motion with evidence tending to negate such exposure precluded the entry of summary judgment in its favor. Catrett v. Johns-ManvilleSearch
-
Electronic Products, 723 F.2d 238 (1983), rev'd on other grounds sub nom. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. ZenithSearch
-
Anderson v. LibertySearch
-
has rendered a decision squarely rejecting the position adopted here by the District of Columbia Circuit. See Fontenot v. UpjohnSearch
-
Catrett v. Johns-ManvilleSearch
-
its claim, a trial would be useless, and the moving party is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. Anderson v. LibertySearch
-
expression from the Court to the contrary, JUSTICE WHITE's understanding would seem to be controlling. Cf. Marks v. UnitedSearch
-
p. 124. Summary judgment should not be granted unless it is clear that a trial is unnecessary, Anderson v. LibertySearch
-
Stepanischen v. MerchantsSearch
-
Higgenbotham v. OchsnerSearch
-
Antitrust Litigation, 723 F.2d 238 (1983), rev'd on other grounds sub nom. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. ZenithSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
the court that there is no genuine issue of material fact for trial. See, e.g., First National Bank of Arizona v. CitiesSearch
-
See Catrett v. Johns-ManvilleSearch
-
ante at 477 U. S. 327 , is bewildering because there is no question of local law to be decided. Cf. Bishop v. WoodSearch
-
Icicle Seafoods, Inc. v. WorthinstonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Celotex Corp. v. CatrettSearch
-
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. ZenithSearch
-
the District of Columbia Circuit. See Fontenot v. UpjohnSearch
-
Cf. Marks v. UnitedSearch
-
Stepanischen v. MerchantsSearch
-
First National Bank of Arizona v. CitiesSearch
-
Cf. Bishop v. WoodSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial