Citation network
Kuhlmann Vs. Wilson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 26, 1986
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 436 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court Kuhlmann v. WilsonSearch
-
U.S. 436 (1986) Kuhlmann v. WilsonSearch
-
The District Court denied the writ, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. After the 1980 decision in United States v. HenrySearch
-
test of Massiah v. UnitedSearch
-
relief, but the Court of Appeals reversed. As an initial matter, the Court of Appeals concluded that, under Sanders v. UnitedSearch
-
V, concluding that the Court of Appeals erred in holding that respondent was entitled to relief under United States v. HenrySearch
-
the ground that the prior judgment denying relief on respondent's identical Sixth Amendment claim was final. Sanders v. UnitedSearch
-
because the police were not required to prevent talkative defendants from making incriminating statements. See People v. KayeSearch
-
to a concurrent term of up to 7 years on the weapons count. The Appellate Division affirmed without opinion, People v. WilsonSearch
-
obtained pursuant to police investigative methods that violated his constitutional rights. After considering Massiah v. UnitedSearch
-
A divided panel of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed. Wilson v. HendersonSearch
-
Id. at 1189, quoting Massiah v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
States, supra, at 377 U. S. 206 . Relying in part on Brewer v. WilliamsSearch
-
We denied a Page 477 U. S. 442 petition for a writ of certiorari. Wilson v. HendersonSearch
-
U.S. 945 (1979). Following this Court's decision in United States v. HenrySearch
-
and that. under state precedent, Henry was not to be given retroactive effect, see People v. PepperSearch
-
United States v. HenrySearch
-
from respondent. A different, and again divided, panel of the Court of Appeals reversed. Wilson v. HendersonSearch
-
F.2d 741 (1984). As an initial matter, the court stated that, under Sanders v. UnitedSearch
-
was appropriate to entertain respondent's successive habeas corpus petition, the Court of Appeals relied upon Sanders v. UnitedSearch
-
Brown v. AllenSearch
-
U. S. 465 , 428 U. S. 475 (1976). See Wainwright v. SykesSearch
-
of a committing court of competent jurisdiction was accorded absolute respect on habeas review. See Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
-
writ to challenge convictions where the prisoner claimed a violation of certain constitutional rights. See Wainwright v. SykesSearch
-
this expansion while purporting to adhere to the inquiry into the sentencing court's jurisdiction. Wainwright v. SykesSearch
-
Ibid., quoting Waley v. JohnstonSearch
-
Our decisions have not been limited to expanding the scope of the writ. Significantly, in Stone v. PowellSearch
-
U. S. 391 , 372 U. S. 438 (1963), citing United States ex rel. Smith v. BaldiSearch
-
U. S. 561 , 344 U. S. 573 (1953) (dissenting opinion). See Stone v. PowellSearch
-
in light of modern concepts of justice. Fay v. NoiaSearch
-
supra, at 372 U. S. 440 -441. See Stone v. PowellSearch
-
corpus adjudication of constitutional claims determined adversely to the prisoner by the state courts. E.g., Engle v. IsaacSearch
-
Sanders v. UnitedSearch
-
See Engle v. IsaacSearch
-
in Criminal Law and Federal Habeas Corpus for State Prisoners, 76 Harv.L.Rev. 441, 452 (1963)). See Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
-
Page 477 U. S. 454 Engle v. IsaacSearch
-
habeas petition, we conclude that it erred in holding that respondent was entitled to relief under United States v. HenrySearch
-
Our review of the line of cases beginning with Massiah v. UnitedSearch
-
negatively. A The decision in Massiah had its roots in two concurring opinions written in Spano v. NewSearch
-
York, 360 U. S. 315 (1959). See Maine v. MoultonSearch
-
Ibid., quoting United States v. MassiahSearch
-
Page 477 U. S. 458 In United States v. HenrySearch
-
incriminating statements made under circumstances substantially similar to the facts of Massiah itself. In Maine v. MoultonSearch
-
Ibid. (quoting United States v. HenrySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Kuhlmann v. WilsonSearch
-
of Massiah v. UnitedSearch
-
See People v. KayeSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial