Citation network
Lyng Vs. Castillo
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 27, 1986
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 635 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court Lyng v. CastilloSearch
-
U.S. 635 (1986) Lyng v. CastilloSearch
-
was required. Id. at 7a. Relying primarily on United States Dept. of Agriculture v. MorenoSearch
-
and they are not a minority, or politically powerless. See, e.g., Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSearch
-
interfere with family living arrangements, and thereby burden a fundamental right. Zablocki v. RedhailSearch
-
See 50 Fed.Reg. 36641, 36642 (1985). Thus, just as in Page 477 U. S. 639 United States Dept. of Agriculture v. MorenoSearch
-
Hampton v. MowSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Sun Wong, 426 U. S. 88 , 426 U. S. 100 (1976). Accord, e.g., United States Dept. of Agriculture v. MorenoSearch
-
In United States Dept. of Agriculture v. MorenoSearch
-
food stamp participation by communal households (so-called 'hippie communes'). In 1973, the Supreme Court, in Moreno v. U.SSearch
-
Califano v. JobstSearch
-
quoting Metropolis Theatre Co. v. ChicagoSearch
-
demonstrates yet again the lack of vitality in this Court's recent equal protection jurisprudence. See, e.g., Cleburne v. CleburneSearch
-
San Antonio Independent School Dist. v. RodriguezSearch
-
that the challenged statute does not directly and substantially interfere with family living arrangements, cf. Moore v. EastSearch
-
cut off due process analysis -- be it procedural or substantive -- by simply invoking such a distinction. See Goldberg v. KellySearch
-
doubt that the classification used here could pass even a rational basis test. In United States Dept. of Agriculture v. MorenoSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Lyng v. CastilloSearch
-
Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSearch
-
Moreno v. U.SSearch
-
Cleburne v. CleburneSearch
-
Moore v. EastSearch
-
See Goldberg v. KellySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial