Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Bazemore Vs. Friday

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jul 01, 1986

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

44 entries 2 linked 42 unlinked
Show
  1. Pullman-standard Vs. Swint US Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1982
  2. Albemarle Paper Co. Vs. Moody US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1975
  3. U.S. 385 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court Bazemore v. Friday
    Search
  4. U.S. 385 (1986) Bazemore v. Friday
    Search
  5. Together with No. 85-428, United States et al. v. Friday
    Search
  6. F.2d at 670. Relying on our cases in Hazelwood School District v. United
    Search
  7. States, 433 U. S. 299 (1977), and United Air Lines, Inc. v. Evans
    Search
  8. Teamsters v. United
    Search
  9. U. S. 324 , 431 U. S. 336 (1977). Further, our decision in United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens
    Search
  10. U. S. 715 . This determination is subject to the clearly erroneous standard on appellate review. See Anderson v. Bessemer
    Search
  11. his or her burden is to prove discrimination by a preponderance of the evidence. Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. Burdine
    Search
  12. GX 98. As we made clear in Hazelwood School District v. United
    Search
  13. in the record. United States v. United
    Search
  14. The Court of Appeals analogized the present case to its decision in Stastny v. Southern
    Search
  15. Pet. App. 44a-46a. It cited our opinion in General Telephone Co. v. EEOC
    Search
  16. make out a constitutional violation. As the District Court found, one's choice of a Club is entirely voluntary. Green v. School
    Search
  17. In addition, they contend that the decision of this Court in Green v. School
    Search
  18. desegregate its schools, because it failed to achieve the racially nondiscriminatory school system mandated by Brown v. Board
    Search
  19. cannot be met simply by a demonstration that no black person has been turned away from an all-white club. See Gilmore v. City
    Search
  20. Keyes v. School
    Search
  21. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg
    Search
  22. Louisiana v. United
    Search
  23. U. S. 145 , 380 U. S. 154 (1965) (voting rights context) (emphasis added). See also Carter v. Jury
    Search
  24. U. S. 320 , 396 U. S. 340 (1970) (Jury selection context). The United States agrees that Green v. School
    Search
  25. U.S. at 391 U. S. 440 (quoting Bowman v. County
    Search
  26. is compulsory to voluntary public amenities such as parks and recreational facilities. See, e.g., Gilmore v. City
    Search
  27. Watson v. Memphis
    Search
  28. Dawson v. Mayor
    Search
  29. Muir v. Louisville
    Search
  30. U.S. Supreme Court Bazemore v. Friday
    Search
  31. Hazelwood School District v. United
    Search
  32. and United Air Lines, Inc. v. Evans
    Search
  33. United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens
    Search
  34. See Anderson v. Bessemer
    Search
  35. Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. Burdine
    Search
  36. United States v. United
    Search
  37. Stastny v. Southern
    Search
  38. General Telephone Co. v. EEOC
    Search
  39. Green v. School
    Search
  40. Brown v. Board
    Search
  41. See Gilmore v. City
    Search
  42. Carter v. Jury
    Search
  43. Bowman v. County
    Search
  44. Gilmore v. City
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial