Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. James

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jul 02, 1986

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

44 entries 6 linked 38 unlinked
Show
  1. American Tobacco Co. Vs. Patterson US Supreme Court · Apr 05, 1982
  2. American Stevedores, Inc. Vs. Porello US Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1947
  3. United States Vs. Sponenbarger US Supreme Court · Dec 04, 1939
  4. Nixon Vs. Fitzgerald US Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1982
  5. Butz Vs. Economou US Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1978
  6. Harlow Vs. Fitzgerald US Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1982
  7. U.S. 597 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. James
    Search
  8. U.S. 597 (1986) United States v. James
    Search
  9. conceded that it negligently failed to warn the decedent. The District Court found, however, that, under Graci v United
    Search
  10. States, 456 F.2d 20 (CA5 1971), and Florida East Coast R. Co. v. United
    Search
  11. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor
    Search
  12. Rothschild v. United
    Search
  13. States, 179 U. S. 463 , 179 U. S. 465 (1900). Page 478 U. S. 605 Cf. TVA v. Hill
    Search
  14. Rubin v. United
    Search
  15. Consumer Product Safety Comm'n v. GTE
    Search
  16. was no drafting inadvertence. See National Mfg. Co. v. United
    Search
  17. Dalehite v. United
    Search
  18. In Graci v. United
    Search
  19. immunity only for floods or floodwaters connected with a flood control project. In Florida East Coast R. Co v. United
    Search
  20. immunity to the Federal Government from damages caused by floodwaters from a flood control project. See, e.g., Portis v. Folk
    Search
  21. Morici Corp. v. United
    Search
  22. Callaway v. United
    Search
  23. Parks v. United
    Search
  24. See Morici Corp. v. United
    Search
  25. quoting Peterson v. United
    Search
  26. Hayes v. United
    Search
  27. Government's sovereign immunity. See Brief for Respondent James et al. 33, citing, inter alia, Harlow v. Fitzgerald
    Search
  28. As Chief Judge Cockburn explained in Smith v. Brown
    Search
  29. but is of a substantial character, and necessary to be attended to. . . . Page 478 U. S. 615 See Seward v. The
    Search
  30. Simpson v. Blues
    Search
  31. Ante at 478 U. S. 605 (quoting American Stevedores, Inc. v. Porello
    Search
  32. a claim that the 1928 Act created a new federal remedy for property damage was advanced and rejected in United States v. Sponenbarger
    Search
  33. in the alluvial valley of the Mississippi River posed by recurrent floods since at least 1717. See United States v. Sponenbarger
    Search
  34. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. James
    Search
  35. Graci v. United
    Search
  36. and Florida East Coast R. Co. v. United
    Search
  37. Cf. TVA v. Hill
    Search
  38. See National Mfg. Co. v. United
    Search
  39. In Florida East Coast R. Co v. United
    Search
  40. Portis v. Folk
    Search
  41. Peterson v. United
    Search
  42. Smith v. Brown
    Search
  43. See Seward v. The
    Search
  44. See United States v. Sponenbarger
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial