Citation network
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Vs. Thompson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jul 07, 1986
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 804 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals v. ThompsonSearch
-
U.S. 804 (1986) Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. ThompsonSearch
-
state forum on the ground that the federal court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. Relying on our decision in Smith v. KansasSearch
-
After quoting one sentence from the concluding paragraph in our recent opinion in Franchise Tax Board v. ConstructionSearch
-
of the action, Osborn v. BankSearch
-
grant of federal question Jurisdiction as conferring a more limited power. Page 478 U. S. 808 Verlinden B.V. v. CentralSearch
-
Romero v. InternationalSearch
-
A defense that raises a federal question is inadequate to confer federal jurisdiction. Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. MottleySearch
-
Id. at 463 U. S. 8 -9, quoting American Well Works Co. v. LayneSearch
-
Textile Workers v. LincolnSearch
-
Co. v. PhillipsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Merrell Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CurranSearch
-
Id. at 463 U. S. 20 -21 (quoting Gully v. FirstSearch
-
The case most frequently cited for that proposition is Smith v. KansasSearch
-
T. B. Harms Co. v. EliscuSearch
-
Jurisdiction may not be sustained on a theory that the plaintiff has not advanced. See Healy v. SeaSearch
-
The Fair v. KohlerSearch
-
United States v. MottazSearch
-
See California v. SierraSearch
-
Cannon v. UniversitySearch
-
See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CurranSearch
-
Cf. Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. NationalSearch
-
In 1975, in Cort v. AshSearch
-
Daily Income Fund, Inc. v. FoxSearch
-
Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. NationalSearch
-
Texas Industries, Inc. v. RadcliffSearch
-
California v. SierraSearch
-
Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. TransportSearch
-
Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSearch
-
Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSearch
-
Cf. Mobil Oil Corp. v. HigginbothamSearch
-
California v. SierraSearch
-
Textile Workers v. LincolnSearch
-
Gully v. FirstSearch
-
Under Federal Law, 115 U.PaL.Rev. 890, 916 (1967). Cf. Kravitz v. HomeownersSearch
-
conflict between the finding of federal jurisdiction in Smith v. KansasSearch
-
City Title & Trust Co., 255 U. S. 180 (1921), and the finding of no jurisdiction in Moore v. ChesapeakeSearch
-
quoting Minneapolis, St. P. & S.S.M. R. Co. v. PopplarSearch
-
brought under federal question jurisdiction because of the overwhelming predominance of state law issues. See Shulthis v. McDougalSearch
-
Cf. Longshoremen v. DavisSearch
-
See Moore v. ChesapeakeSearch
-
state law, claims would be determined by the ordinary principles of pendent jurisdiction described in Mine Workers v. GibbsSearch
-
Martin v. Hunter'sSearch
-
Verlinden B.V. v. CentralSearch
-
jurisdiction (an inference that is supported by the contemporary evidence, see Franchise Tax Board v. ConstructionSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals v. ThompsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial