Citation network
Munro Vs. Socialist Workers
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 10, 1986
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Munro v. SocialistSearch
-
Workers - 479 U.S. 189 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court Munro v. SocialistSearch
-
Workers, 479 U.S. 189 (1986) Munro, Secretary of State of Washington v. SocialistSearch
-
candidates to make a preliminary showing of substantial support in order to qualify for a place on the ballot. Jenness v. FortsonSearch
-
associate for political purposes, as well as the rights of qualified voters to cast their votes effectively, Williams v. RhodesSearch
-
U. S. 30 (1968), and may not survive scrutiny under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. In Williams v. RhodesSearch
-
not absolute, and are necessarily subject to qualification if elections are to be run fairly and effectively. Storer v. BrownSearch
-
or independent candidate upon a showing of a modicum of support among the potential voters for the office. In Jenness v. FortsonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Id. at 403 U. S. 442 . And, in American Party of Texas v. WhiteSearch
-
showing of significant support before placing a candidate on the general election ballot. American Party of Texas v. WhiteSearch
-
the presence of frivolous candidacies prior to the imposition of reasonable restrictions on ballot access. In Jenness v. FortsonSearch
-
petition-signature requirement. In American Party of Texas v. WhiteSearch
-
Id. at 460 U. S. 782 . And, in Storer v. BrownSearch
-
of the Party in the State is free to cast his or her ballot for the Party's candidates. As was the case in Jenness v. FortsonSearch
-
most clearly where minor party access to the ballot is restricted. As we noted in Illinois Board of Elections v. SocialistSearch
-
further a compelling state interest, and must be narrowly tailored to achieve that goal. Illinois Board of Elections v. SocialistSearch
-
ante at 479 U. S. 196 , quoting Storer v. BrownSearch
-
Illinois Board of Elections v. SocialistSearch
-
Williams v. RhodesSearch
-
to achieve the State's ends. Illinois Board of Elections v. SocialistSearch
-
may not employ ballot access limitations which result in the exclusion of minor parties from the ballot. See Williams v. RhodesSearch
-
American Party of Texas, 415 U.S. at 415 U. S. 783 , quoting Jenness v. FortsonSearch
-
could be expected to satisfy the ballot access requirement. Storer v. BrownSearch
-
ballot under the ballot access restrictions there at issue. Id. at 415 U. S. 779 . Similarly, in Jenness v. FortsonSearch
-
should not be sustained as a legitimate requirement of a demonstration of significant support. Since Williams v. RhodesSearch
-
See Socialist Workers Party v. SecretarySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Munro v. SocialistSearch
-
Munro, Secretary of State of Washington v. SocialistSearch
-
the First and Fourteenth Amendments. In Williams v. RhodesSearch
-
In Jenness v. FortsonSearch
-
In American Party of Texas v. WhiteSearch
-
See Williams v. RhodesSearch
-
Since Williams v. RhodesSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial