Citation network
Alexander Vs. Choate
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 09, 1985
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 287 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court Alexander v. ChoateSearch
-
U.S. 287 (1985) Alexander v. ChoateSearch
-
violation. Jennings v. AlexanderSearch
-
the handicapped. As support for this position, the State relies heavily on our recent decision in Guardians Assn. v. CivilSearch
-
Cf. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. DarroneSearch
-
might make actionable, the proper starting point is Southeastern Community College v. DavisSearch
-
the handicapped from or deny them the benefits of the 14 days of care the State has chosen to provide. Cf. Jefferson v. HackneySearch
-
through government subsidization. Nothing in the legislative history of the Act supports such a conclusion. Cf. Doe v. ColauttiSearch
-
individuals to participate in and benefit from programs receiving federal assistance. Southeastern Community College v. DavisSearch
-
to choose the proper mix of amount, scope, and duration limitations on services covered by state Medicaid, see Beal v. DoeSearch
-
participate in Medicaid, the State must comply with the requirements of Title XIX and applicable regulations. Harris v. McRaeSearch
-
See Jennings v. AlexanderSearch
-
Jennings v. AlexanderSearch
-
Lau v. NicholsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
prong of Guardians was settled by their view that a majority of the Court in University of California Regents v. BakkeSearch
-
See United States v. RutherfordSearch
-
Cannon v. UniversitySearch
-
reaches disparate impact discrimination. See, e.g., New Mexico Assn. for Retarded Citizens v. NewSearch
-
Pushkin v. RegentsSearch
-
Dopico v. GoldschmidtSearch
-
NAACP v. WilmingtonSearch
-
Majors v. HousingSearch
-
Jones v. IllinoisSearch
-
Dept. of Rehabilitation Services, 689 F.2d 724 (CA7 1982), Stutts v. FreemanSearch
-
Georgia Assn. of Retarded Citizens v. McDanielSearch
-
F.2d 1565, 1578-1580 (CA11 1983), vacated for further consideration in light of Smith v. RobinsonSearch
-
Loury v. DumpsonSearch
-
Dopico v. GoldschmidtSearch
-
Tr. of Oral Arg. 14-15 (referring to Lau v. NicholsSearch
-
annual limits on hospital care are in fact consistent with the Medicaid Act. See, e.g., Charleston Memorial Hospital v. ConradSearch
-
Virginia Hospital Assn. v. KenleySearch
-
See Consolidated Rail Corporation v. DarroneSearch
-
Southeastern Community College v. DavisSearch
-
Guardians Assn. v. CivilSearch
-
was enacted. See, e.g., Andrus v. ShellSearch
-
Seatrain Shipbuilding Corp. v. ShellSearch
-
Consolidated Rail Corporation v. DarroneSearch
-
Guardians Assn. v. CivilSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Alexander v. ChoateSearch
-
Guardians Assn. v. CivilSearch
-
Cf. Jefferson v. HackneySearch
-
Cf. Doe v. ColauttiSearch
-
Harris v. McRaeSearch
-
University of California Regents v. BakkeSearch
-
Retarded Citizens v. NewSearch
-
Stutts v. FreemanSearch
-
of Smith v. RobinsonSearch
-
Loury v. DumpsonSearch
-
Charleston Memorial Hospital v. ConradSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial