Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Brandon Vs. Holt

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 21, 1985

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

34 entries 2 linked 32 unlinked
Show
  1. Hutto Vs. Finney US Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1978
  2. Monroe Vs. Pape US Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1961
    Distinguished
  3. U.S. 464 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court Brandon v. Holt
    Search
  4. U.S. 464 (1985) Brandon v. Holt
    Search
  5. The city was not named as a defendant in this case because the complaint was filed before Monroe v. Pape
    Search
  6. was overruled by Monell v. New
    Search
  7. and Owen v. City
    Search
  8. a damages judgment against the Director of the Memphis (Tenn.) Police Department in his official capacity. Brandon v. Allen
    Search
  9. The Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed, holding that he was protected by qualified immunity. Brandon v. Allen
    Search
  10. qualified immunity is inapplicable simply because they sued Chapman in his official capacity is unavailing. Under Owen v. City
    Search
  11. certiorari to consider the validity of that argument. 467 U.S. 1204 (1984). We now reverse. I In Monroe v. Pape
    Search
  12. protected municipalities from liability in cases of this kind until June 6, 1978, when we decided Monell v. New
    Search
  13. of Social Services, 436 U. S. 658 . The complaint in this case was filed on February 22, 1978, before Monroe v. Pape
    Search
  14. represent an action against an entity of which an officer is an agent. . . . Page 469 U. S. 470 Monell v. New
    Search
  15. and in the proceedings relating to damages in which it was recognized that our decision in Newport v. Facts
    Search
  16. Less than two years later, we decided Owen v. City
    Search
  17. Brandon v. Allen
    Search
  18. Complaint, Brandon v. Allen
    Search
  19. Monell v. New
    Search
  20. see also Order Denying Petition for Rehearing En Banc, Brandon v. Allen
    Search
  21. at 436 U. S. 694 . Because the Court of Appeals did not address this argument, we do not consider it. Monsanto v. Spray-Rite
    Search
  22. Adickes v. S.H
    Search
  23. Duignan v. United
    Search
  24. Court relies upon its characterization of three of our recent opinions. Quoting footnote 55 from the opinion in Monell v. New
    Search
  25. as defendant can result in the judgment against the city itself. The Court also relies on the opinion in Hutto v. Finney
    Search
  26. the novel doctrine for which the Court now says that it stands. The third case upon which the Court relies is Owen v. City
    Search
  27. U.S. Supreme Court Brandon v. Holt
    Search
  28. Monell v. New
    Search
  29. Under Owen v. City
    Search
  30. I In Monroe v. Pape
    Search
  31. Newport v. Facts
    Search
  32. Owen v. City
    Search
  33. Rehearing En Banc, Brandon v. Allen
    Search
  34. Monsanto v. Spray-Rite
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales