Citation network
Wainwright Vs. Witt
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 21, 1985
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 412 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court Wainwright v. WittSearch
-
U.S. 412 (1985) Wainwright v. WittSearch
-
excluded for cause because of their opposition to capital punishment, in violation of the decision in Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
Adams v. TexasSearch
-
for selection of jurors in criminal trials involving the possible imposition of capital punishment, see Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
for cause because of their opposition to capital punishment, in violation of this Court's decision in Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
supra. The Florida Supreme Court affirmed the conviction and sentence, and this Court denied certiorari. Witt v. StateSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U.S. 935 (1977). After unsuccessfully petitioning for postconviction review in the state courts, see Witt v. StateSearch
-
The court found its holding consistent with Circuit precedent applying the Witherspoon standard. See Granviel v. EstelleSearch
-
Burns v. EstelleSearch
-
should pay to a state trial judge's determination that a juror may be excused for cause under Witherspoon, see Darden v. WainwrightSearch
-
O'Bryan v. EstelleSearch
-
as setting the standard for judging the proper exclusion of a juror opposed to capital punishment. See, e.g., Maxwell v. BishopSearch
-
Hackathorn v. DeckerSearch
-
People v. WashingtonSearch
-
Burns v. EstelleSearch
-
In Lockett v. OhioSearch
-
Id. at 438 U. S. 596 . This Court again examined the Witherspoon standard in Adams v. TexasSearch
-
never vote for the death sentence or who could not impartially judge guilt. After our decisions in Furman v. GeorgiaSearch
-
U. S. 238 (1972), and Gregg v. GeorgiaSearch
-
See McDaniel v. SanchezSearch
-
seeking exclusion who must demonstrate, through questioning, that the potential juror lacks impartiality. See Reynolds v. UnitedSearch
-
Adams, but it is equally true of any situation where a party seeks to exclude a biased juror. See, e.g., Patton v. YountSearch
-
on Page 469 U. S. 427 this section and accorded deference to the state trial judge's finding of bias, Witt v. WainwrightSearch
-
not subject to the section. See Darden v. WainwrightSearch
-
d) presumption. See, e.g., Patton v. YountSearch
-
a trial court's determination that a prospective capital sentencing juror was properly excluded for cause. In Darden v. WainwrightSearch
-
holding, we in no way denigrate the importance of an impartial jury. We reiterate what this Court stressed in Dennis v. UnitedSearch
-
his conclusion that juror Colby was biased, or his reasoning. The finding is evident from the record. See Marshall v. LonbergerSearch
-
not indicate the standard applied by a state trial judge, he is presumed to have applied the correct one. See Marshall v. LonbergerSearch
-
LaVallee v. DelleSearch
-
the opinion is, after all, an opinion and not an intricate devise in a will. As we emphasized in Marshall v. LonbergerSearch
-
but the trial court found to the contrary. As we stated in Marshall v. LonbergerSearch
-
Boyd v. BoydSearch
-
decisionmaking in both Maxwell v. BishopSearch
-
U. S. 262 (1970), and Boulden v. HolmanSearch
-
See, for example, the excerpts of the voir dire of venireman Pfeffer set out in O'Bryan v. EstelleSearch
-
In Reynolds v. UnitedSearch
-
In O'Bryan v. EstelleSearch
-
independent mechanisms of state government that already have reached one decision on the same facts. See also Darden v. WainwrightSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Wainwright v. WittSearch
-
Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial