Citation network
United States Vs. Young
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 20, 1985
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 1 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. YoungSearch
-
U.S. 1 (1985) United States v. YoungSearch
-
taken in context, unfairly prejudiced the defendant. Lawn v. UnitedSearch
-
a timely objection. Our task is to Page 470 U. S. 7 decide whether the standard laid down in United States v. AtkinsonSearch
-
Berger v. UnitedSearch
-
Sacher v. UnitedSearch
-
Geders v. UnitedSearch
-
Dunlop v. UnitedSearch
-
Quercia v. UnitedSearch
-
the prosecutor and defense counsel must be kept within appropriate Page 470 U. S. 11 bounds. See Herring v. NewSearch
-
rule, which the Court treated in Lawn v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
context, defense counsel's conduct, as well as the nature of the prosecutor's response, is relevant. See United States v. Socony-VacuumSearch
-
Crumpton v. UnitedSearch
-
defense counsel's misconduct could have warranted the judge to interrupt the argument and admonish him, see Viereck v. UnitedSearch
-
harmful to his client. Here, neither counsel made a timely objection to preserve the issue for review. See Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSearch
-
Namet v. UnitedSearch
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
court to assess the seriousness of the claimed error by any other means. As the Court stated in United States v. Socony-VacuumSearch
-
as to undermine the fundamental fairness of the trial and contribute to a miscarriage of justice. See United States v. FradySearch
-
to trust the Government's judgment, rather than its Page 470 U. S. 19 own view of the evidence. See Berger v. UnitedSearch
-
Although it was improper for the prosecutor to express his personal opinion about respondent's guilt, see Berger v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. DiPasqualeSearch
-
United States v. MacciniSearch
-
United States v. BagaricSearch
-
United States v. WestSearch
-
United States v. GarzaSearch
-
Berger v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. WexlerSearch
-
United States v. TrujilloSearch
-
United States v. ThamSearch
-
United States v. SchwartzSearch
-
United States v. PraetoriusSearch
-
United States v. KimSearch
-
could reverse an otherwise proper conviction only after concluding that the error was not harmless. See United States v. HastingSearch
-
appeared largely as dicta in earlier opinions. See, e.g., United States v. RiosSearch
-
United States v. LatimerSearch
-
United States v. CoppolaSearch
-
F.2d 1153, 1163 (CA10 1973). But see United States v. LudwigSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. YoungSearch
-
Lawn v. UnitedSearch
-
See Herring v. NewSearch
-
See United States v. Socony-VacuumSearch
-
Viereck v. UnitedSearch
-
See Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSearch
-
United States v. Socony-VacuumSearch
-
See United States v. FradySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial