Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Heckler Vs. Turner

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 27, 1985

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

38 entries 2 linked 36 unlinked
Show
  1. Shea Vs. Vialpando US Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1974
  2. Van Lare Vs. Hurley US Supreme Court · May 19, 1975
  3. U.S. 184 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court Heckler v. Turner
    Search
  4. U.S. 184 (1985) Heckler v. Turner
    Search
  5. from implementing its new regulations and the Secretary from terminating federal matching funds due the State. Turner v. Woods
    Search
  6. F.Supp. 603 (1982). On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed. Turner v. Prod
    Search
  7. King v. Smith
    Search
  8. intended these tandem provisions to operate, we look first, as always, to the language of the statute. North Dakota v. United
    Search
  9. Page 470 U. S. 201 (1967) (quoted in Lewis v. Martin
    Search
  10. U.S. at 392 U. S. 319 , n. 16, and has not hesitated to give it effect in that case and others. See Lewis v. Martin
    Search
  11. on imputed or unrealizable sources of income artificially to depreciate a recipient's need. For example, in King v. Smith
    Search
  12. James v. O'Bannon
    Search
  13. F.Supp. 631, 641 (ED Pa.1982), aff'd, 715 F.2d 794 (CA3 1983), cert. pending sub nom. James v. Cohen
    Search
  14. Dickenson v. Petit
    Search
  15. in Shea v. Vialpando
    Search
  16. See Shea v. Vialpando
    Search
  17. to the actions of an earlier one, but we by no means eschew what guidance they offer. Consumer Product Safety Comm'n v. GTE
    Search
  18. Cannon v. University
    Search
  19. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC
    Search
  20. FHA v. The
    Search
  21. See Dickenson v. Petit
    Search
  22. F.2d 794 (CA3 1983), cert. pending sub nom. James v. Cohen
    Search
  23. Bell v. Massinga
    Search
  24. King v. Smith
    Search
  25. but instead may establish dollar maxima or provide only a specified percentage of the family's need. See Rosado v. Wyman
    Search
  26. Connecticut State Dept. of Public Welfare v. HEW
    Search
  27. See Heckler v. Turner
    Search
  28. U.S. Supreme Court Heckler v. Turner
    Search
  29. the State. Turner v. Woods
    Search
  30. Turner v. Prod
    Search
  31. North Dakota v. United
    Search
  32. Lewis v. Martin
    Search
  33. See Lewis v. Martin
    Search
  34. James v. Cohen
    Search
  35. Consumer Product Safety Comm'n v. GTE
    Search
  36. See Rosado v. Wyman
    Search
  37. Connecticut State Dept. of Public Welfare v. HEW
    Search
  38. Rosado v. Wyman
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial