Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Fec Vs. Ncpac

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 18, 1985

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

49 entries 6 linked 43 unlinked
Show
  1. Buckley Vs. Valeo US Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1976
    Relied / Followed
  2. Naacp Vs. Alabama US Supreme Court · Jun 08, 1959
  3. Broadrick Vs. Oklahoma US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1973
    Distinguished
  4. New York Times Co. Vs. Sullivan US Supreme Court · Mar 09, 1964
  5. Connick Vs. Myers US Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1983
  6. Kaiser Steel Corp. Vs. Mullins US Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1982
  7. U.S. 480 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court FEC v. NCPAC
    Search
  8. U.S. 480 (1985) Federal Election Commission v. National
    Search
  9. about the standing of the FEC and the legal issues and relief requested are the same in the two cases. See McCulloch v. Sociedad
    Search
  10. publicly or privately funded. Important provisions of these Acts have already been reviewed by this Court in Buckley v. Valeo
    Search
  11. that the expenditures at issue in this case produce speech at the core of the First Amendment. We said in Buckley v. Valeo
    Search
  12. unfettered interchange of ideas for the bringing about of political and social changes desired by the people.' Roth v. United
    Search
  13. to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open,' New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
    Search
  14. in a public hall to express his views while denying him the use of an amplifying system. The Court said in Buckley v. Valeo
    Search
  15. Citizens Against Rent Control v. Berkeley
    Search
  16. California Medical Assn. v. FEC
    Search
  17. to those sufficiently wealthy to be able to buy expensive media ads with their own resources. Our decision in FEC v. National
    Search
  18. are of a different constitutional stature than corporate contributions to candidates. First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti
    Search
  19. election as to the wealthy and professionally managed PACs involved in these cases. See Citizens Against Rent Control v. Berkeley
    Search
  20. effort by the Government to regulate the use of its own property, such as was involved in United States Postal Service v. Greenburgh
    Search
  21. U. S. 114 (1981), or the dismissal of a speaker from Government employment, such as was involved in Connick v. Myers
    Search
  22. of prophylactic limitations, but are concerned about wholesale restriction of clearly protected conduct. See Broadrick v. Oklahoma
    Search
  23. Together with No. 83-1122, Democratic Party of the United States et al. v. National
    Search
  24. to decide the issue discussed in 470 U. S. 83-1122 is controlled by our decision in No. 83-1032. McCulloch v. Sociedad
    Search
  25. indication that such a repeal was intended, we should not infer Page 470 U. S. 505 it. Kaiser Steel Corp. v. Mullins
    Search
  26. Posadas v. National
    Search
  27. of congressional efforts to regulate campaign financing, are many. First, I continue to believe that Buckley v. Valeo
    Search
  28. threat to the integrity and fairness of the electoral process, we should not second-guess that judgment. FEC v. National
    Search
  29. First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti
    Search
  30. I had thought the holding in Buckley was exactly the opposite. Certainly later cases would so indicate. See FEC v. National
    Search
  31. California Medical Assn. v. FEC
    Search
  32. the PACs' speech into that of its contributors. California Medical Assn. v. FEC
    Search
  33. See Bread Political Action Committee v. FEC
    Search
  34. expenditures more compelling. See also First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti
    Search
  35. the extent it does, I would have thought that such a conclusion was foreclosed by the Court's unanimous holding in FEC v. National
    Search
  36. U. S. 499 . But that is exactly why the statute is not overbroad. See Members of City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers
    Search
  37. on its candidate's behalf. N.Y. Times, Aug. 29, 1984, p. A20, col. 1. JUSTICE MARSHALL, dissenting. In Buckley v. Valeo
    Search
  38. U.S. Supreme Court FEC v. NCPAC
    Search
  39. Federal Election Commission v. National
    Search
  40. See McCulloch v. Sociedad
    Search
  41. Roth v. United
    Search
  42. FEC v. National
    Search
  43. See Citizens Against Rent Control v. Berkeley
    Search
  44. United States Postal Service v. Greenburgh
    Search
  45. See Broadrick v. Oklahoma
    Search
  46. McCulloch v. Sociedad
    Search
  47. See FEC v. National
    Search
  48. See Members of City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers
    Search
  49. In Buckley v. Valeo
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial