Citation network
Hayes Vs. Florida
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 20, 1985
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 811 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court Hayes v. FloridaSearch
-
U.S. 811 (1985) Hayes v. FloridaSearch
-
hence, the fingerprints taken were the inadmissible fruits of an illegal detention. Davis v. MississippiSearch
-
although finding neither consent nor probable cause, the court held, analogizing to the stop-and-frisk rule of Terry v. OhioSearch
-
this application of Terry, 469 U.S. 816 (1984), and we now reverse. We agree with petitioner that Davis v. MississippiSearch
-
of the Fourth Amendment and exceeded the permissible limits of those temporary seizures authorized by Terry v. OhioSearch
-
cause or judicial authorization together violate the Fourth Amendment. Indeed, some 10 years later, in Dunaway v. NewSearch
-
York, 442 U. S. 200 (1979), we refused to extend Terry v. OhioSearch
-
investigative interrogations at police stations on less than probable cause, even though proper warnings under Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
on less than probable cause. Since that time, we have several times revisited and explored the reach of Terry v. OhioSearch
-
most recently in United States v. SharpeSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
ante p. 470 U. S. 675 , and United States v. HensleySearch
-
cause, is necessarily impermissible under the Fourth Amendment. In addressing the reach of a Terry stop in Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
to question him briefly, or to detain him briefly while attempting to obtain additional information. United States v. HensleySearch
-
negate the suspect's connection with that crime, and if the procedure is carried out with dispatch. Cf. United States v. PlaceSearch
-
to make a warrantless entry into a person's house for the purpose of obtaining fingerprint identification. Payton v. NewSearch
-
on the validity of these efforts to insulate investigative seizures from Fourth Amendment invalidation. Compare People v. MadsonSearch
-
P.2d 18, 31-32 (Colo.1981), with State v. EvansSearch
-
N.Y.2d 288, 295-296, 437 N.E.2d 265, 269 (1982). As we have said, absent probable cause and a warrant, Davis v. MississippiSearch
-
We also put aside the State's suggestion that the inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule, see Nix v. WilliamsSearch
-
Thus, in United States v. SharpeSearch
-
The police have neither probable cause to arrest nor have they obtained a warrant. These were the facts of Davis v. MississippiSearch
-
to detain an individual for on-site fingerprinting, the intrusion would have to be measured by the standards of Terry v. OhioSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Hayes v. FloridaSearch
-
Davis v. MississippiSearch
-
of Terry v. OhioSearch
-
Terry v. OhioSearch
-
Dunaway v. NewSearch
-
Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
and United States v. HensleySearch
-
Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
Cf. United States v. PlaceSearch
-
Payton v. NewSearch
-
Compare People v. MadsonSearch
-
State v. EvansSearch
-
Nix v. WilliamsSearch
-
of Davis v. MississippiSearch
-
United States v. HensleySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial