Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Lindahl Vs. Opm

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 20, 1985

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

63 entries 5 linked 58 unlinked
Show
  1. Abbott Laboratories Vs. Gardner US Supreme Court · May 22, 1967
    Relied / Followed
  2. Brown Vs. Gsa US Supreme Court · Jun 01, 1976
  3. Lorillard Vs. Pons US Supreme Court · Feb 22, 1978
  4. Dunlop Vs. Bachowski US Supreme Court · Jun 02, 1975
    Relied / Followed
  5. Albemarle Paper Co. Vs. Moody US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1975
  6. U.S. 768 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court Lindahl v. OPM
    Search
  7. U.S. 768 (1985) Lindahl v. Office
    Search
  8. questions. Pp. 470 U. S. 779 -780. (c) Under the Scroggins standard (so-called after Scroggins v. United
    Search
  9. invoking the district courts' Tucker Act jurisdiction to entertain monetary claims against the United States. Dismuke v. United
    Search
  10. U. S. 136 , 387 U. S. 141 (1967). See also Dunlop v. Bachowski
    Search
  11. c). See Dismuke v. United
    Search
  12. standard has never turned on a talismanic Page 470 U. S. 779 test. Block v. Community
    Search
  13. standard, so-called after Scroggins v. United
    Search
  14. Turner v. OPM
    Search
  15. United States v. Vogel
    Search
  16. Fertilizer Co., 455 U. S. 16 , 455 U. S. 31 (1982), quoting Zuber v. Allen
    Search
  17. Scroggins v. United
    Search
  18. Meyer v. Department
    Search
  19. of HHS, 229 Ct.Cl. 151, 153-154, 666 F.2d 540, 542 (1981), quoting Richards v. United
    Search
  20. Devine v. White
    Search
  21. of placing agency review in the courts of appeals. Florida Power & Light Co. v. Lorion
    Search
  22. Harrison v. PPG
    Search
  23. a)(6), 1201.56(a) (1984). Cf. Chavez v. OPM
    Search
  24. scrutiny of disability determinations while permitting review for legal and procedural errors. See, e.g., Pitzak v. OPM
    Search
  25. McCard v. MSPB
    Search
  26. Parodi v. MSPB
    Search
  27. F.2d 743, 745-748 (CA9 1982). Others had held that it altogether bars review. See, e.g., Chase v. Director
    Search
  28. Campbell v. OPM
    Search
  29. Morgan v. OPM
    Search
  30. F.2d 196, 198-201 (CA8 1982). But see Lancellotti v. OPM
    Search
  31. Fitzgerald v. United
    Search
  32. Polos v. United
    Search
  33. Fancher v. United
    Search
  34. Allen v. United
    Search
  35. States, 215 Ct.Cl. 524 529-530, 571 F.2d 14, 17-18 (1978), overruled on other grounds, Polos v. United
    Search
  36. McFarland v. United
    Search
  37. Lech v. United
    Search
  38. McGlasson v. United
    Search
  39. Gaines v. United
    Search
  40. Smith v. Dulles
    Search
  41. Matriccialla v. Hampton
    Search
  42. Cantrell v. United
    Search
  43. of a statute, and to adopt that interpretation when it reenacts a statute without change, see Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody
    Search
  44. NLRB v. Gullett
    Search
  45. National Lead Co. v. United
    Search
  46. U. S. 575 , 434 U. S. 580 -581 (1978). See also Bob Jones University v. United
    Search
  47. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Curran
    Search
  48. and Scroggins v. United
    Search
  49. U.S. Supreme Court Lindahl v. OPM
    Search
  50. Lindahl v. Office
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial