Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Winston Vs. Lee

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 20, 1985

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

47 entries 4 linked 43 unlinked
Show
  1. South Dakota Vs. Opperman US Supreme Court · Jul 06, 1976
  2. United States Vs. Brignoni-ponce US Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1975
  3. Terry Vs. Ohio US Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1968
  4. Breithaupt Vs. Abram US Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1957
  5. U.S. 753 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court Winston v. Lee
    Search
  6. U.S. 753 (1985) Winston v. Lee
    Search
  7. fairly determining guilt or innocence. The appropriate framework of analysis for such cases is provided in Schmerber v. California
    Search
  8. in the judgment. Page 470 U. S. 755 JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court. Schmerber v. California
    Search
  9. Katz v. United
    Search
  10. Olmstead v. United
    Search
  11. even if likely to produce evidence of a crime. In Schmerber v. California
    Search
  12. Id. at 384 U. S. 767 . Citing Wolf v. Colorado
    Search
  13. U. S. 25 , 338 U. S. 27 (1949), and Mapp v. Ohio
    Search
  14. privacy and bodily integrity. Intruding into an individual's living room, See Payton Page 470 U. S. 762 v. New
    Search
  15. York, 445 U. S. 573 (1980), eavesdropping upon an individual's telephone conversations, see Katz v. United
    Search
  16. S. at 389 U. S. 361 , or forcing an individual to accompany police officers to the police station, see Dunaway v. New
    Search
  17. has a reasonable expectation of privacy. Where the Court has found a lesser expectation of privacy, see, e.g., Rakas v. Illinois
    Search
  18. U. S. 364 (1976), or where the search involves a minimal intrusion on privacy interests, see, e.g., United States v. Hensley
    Search
  19. Dunaway v. New
    Search
  20. Adams v. Williams
    Search
  21. the District Court denied the relief sought, it found it unnecessary to consider whether res judicata, see Allen v. McCurry
    Search
  22. The Fourth Circuit held that Allen v. McCurry
    Search
  23. Numerous courts have recognized the crucial importance of this factor. See, e.g., Bowden v. State
    Search
  24. People v. Smith
    Search
  25. State v. Allen
    Search
  26. United States v. Crowder
    Search
  27. State v. Overstreet
    Search
  28. quoting Breithaupt v. Abram
    Search
  29. Ibid. As such, the procedure in Schmerber contrasted sharply with the practice in Rochin v. California
    Search
  30. undergo a surgical search of this magnitude for evidence absent such special procedural protections. Cf. United States v. Crowder
    Search
  31. State v. Lawson
    Search
  32. State v. Overstreet
    Search
  33. be raised if the use of a general anesthetic became necessary because of the patient's refusal to cooperate. Cf. State v. Lawson
    Search
  34. U.S. Supreme Court Winston v. Lee
    Search
  35. Schmerber v. California
    Search
  36. of the Court. Schmerber v. California
    Search
  37. Katz v. United
    Search
  38. In Schmerber v. California
    Search
  39. Citing Wolf v. Colorado
    Search
  40. and Mapp v. Ohio
    Search
  41. Rakas v. Illinois
    Search
  42. Allen v. McCurry
    Search
  43. Bowden v. State
    Search
  44. Rochin v. California
    Search
  45. Cf. United States v. Crowder
    Search
  46. Cf. State v. Lawson
    Search
  47. United States v. Hensley
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial