Citation network
Hallie Vs. Eau Claire
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 27, 1985
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Hallie v. EauSearch
-
Claire - 471 U.S. 34 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court Hallie v. EauSearch
-
Claire, 471 U.S. 34 (1985) Town of Hallie v. CitySearch
-
exemption to the federal antitrust laws established by Parker v. BrownSearch
-
state policy. Lafayette v. LouisianaSearch
-
by no means a prerequisite to a finding that a municipality acted pursuant to clearly articulated state policy. Cantor v. DetroitSearch
-
Edison Co., 428 U. S. 579 , and Goldfarb v. VirginiaSearch
-
activities are protected by the state action exemption to the federal antitrust laws established by Parker v. BrownSearch
-
exemption to the federal antitrust laws, as set forth in Community Communications Page 471 U. S. 38 Co. v. BoulderSearch
-
U. S. 40 (1982), and Parker v. BrownSearch
-
and concluded that the City's conduct was thus taken pursuant to state authorization within the meaning of Parker v. BrownSearch
-
affirm. II The starting point in any analysis involving the state action doctrine is the reasoning of Parker v. BrownSearch
-
beyond the reach of the antitrust laws by virtue of their status, because they are not themselves sovereign. Lafayette v. LouisianaSearch
-
the State may not validate a municipality's anticompetitive conduct simply by declaring it to be lawful. Parker v. BrownSearch
-
Id. at 435 U. S. 415 -416. In California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. MidcalSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
it expected the City to engage in conduct that would have anticompetitive effects. Applying the analysis of Lafayette v. LouisianaSearch
-
that anticompetitive effects logically would result from this broad authority to regulate. See New Motor Vehicle Board v. OrrinSearch
-
it to act. In so doing, they rely on language in Cantor v. DetroitSearch
-
Edison Co., 428 U. S. 579 (1976), and Goldfarb v. VirginiaSearch
-
was actively supervised by the State. 435 U.S. at 435 U. S. 410 . In California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. MidcalSearch
-
case involving the state regulation of private anticompetitive acts. See Southern Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
Our view of the legislature's intent is supported by Town of Hallie v. CitySearch
-
must be shown, even where a clearly articulated state policy exists. See Southern Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Hallie v. EauSearch
-
Town of Hallie v. CitySearch
-
Parker v. BrownSearch
-
Lafayette v. LouisianaSearch
-
Cantor v. DetroitSearch
-
and Goldfarb v. VirginiaSearch
-
Co. v. BoulderSearch
-
and Parker v. BrownSearch
-
of Parker v. BrownSearch
-
In California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. MidcalSearch
-
of Lafayette v. LouisianaSearch
-
See New Motor Vehicle Board v. OrrinSearch
-
See Southern Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial