Citation network
Tennessee Vs. Garner
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 27, 1985
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 1 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court Tennessee v. GarnerSearch
-
U.S. 1 (1985) Tennessee v. GarnerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
F.2d 52 (1979). It remanded for reconsideration of the possible liability of the city, however, in light of Monell v. NewSearch
-
II Whenever an officer restrains the freedom of a person to walk away, he has seized that person. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSearch
-
While it is not always clear just when minimal police interference becomes a seizure, see United States v. MendenhallSearch
-
officer may arrest a person if he has probable cause to believe that person committed a crime. E.g., United States v. WatsonSearch
-
Delaware v. ProuseSearch
-
U. S. 692 , 452 U. S. 700 , n. 12 (1981). See also Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
is plain that reasonableness depends on not only when a seizure is made, but also how it is carried out. United States v. OrtizSearch
-
facts, the Court has held that governmental interests did not support a lengthy detention of luggage, United States v. PlaceSearch
-
U. S. 500 (1983) (plurality opinion), surgery under general anesthesia to obtain evidence, Winston v. LeeSearch
-
U. S. 753 (1985), or detention for fingerprinting without probable cause, Davis v. MississippiSearch
-
On the other hand, under the same approach it has upheld the taking of fingernail scrapings from a suspect, Cupp v. MurphySearch
-
U. S. 291 (1973), an unannounced entry into a home to prevent the destruction of evidence, Ker v. CaliforniaSearch
-
administrative housing inspections without probable cause to believe that a code violation will be found, Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
Court, supra, and a blood test of a drunken-driving suspect, Schmerber v. CaliforniaSearch
-
is a sufficiently productive means of accomplishing them to justify the killing of nonviolent suspects. Cf. Delaware v. ProuseSearch
-
doubting that the use of such force is an essential attribute of the arrest power in all felony cases. See Schumann v. McGinnSearch
-
a fleeing misdemeanant, coupled with a general privilege to use such force to stop a fleeing felon. E.g., Holloway v. MoserSearch
-
State v. SmithSearch
-
Reneau v. StateSearch
-
Brooks v. CommonwealthSearch
-
Roberts v. StateSearch
-
Wilgus, Arrest Without a Warrant, 22 Mich.L.Rev. 798, 807-816 (1924). But see Storey v. StateSearch
-
State v. BryantSearch
-
Caldwell v. StateSearch
-
law in evaluating the reasonableness, for Fourth Amendment purposes, of police activity. See, e.g., United States v. WatsonSearch
-
Gersten v. PughSearch
-
Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
Payton v. NewSearch
-
have also justified the common law rule by emphasizing the relative dangerousness of felons. See, e.g., Schumann v. McGinnSearch
-
Holloway v. MoserSearch
-
makes sense today. Almost all crimes formerly punishable by death no longer are or can be. See, e.g., Enmund v. FloridaSearch
-
the use of deadly force to apprehend a misdemeanant, condemning such action as disproportionately severe. See Holloway v. MoserSearch
-
have also looked to prevailing Page 471 U. S. 16 rules in individual jurisdictions. See, e.g., United States v. WatsonSearch
-
Department, Planning & Research Division, The Use of Deadly Force by Boston Police Personnel (1974), cited in Mattis v. SchnarrSearch
-
F.2d 1007, 1016, n.19 (CA8 1976), vacated as moot sub nom. Ashcroft v. MattisSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial