Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Mintzes Vs. Buchanon

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 15, 1985

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

26 entries 3 linked 23 unlinked
Show
  1. Mcmann Vs. Richardson US Supreme Court · May 04, 1970
  2. Colorado Vs. Nunez US Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1984
  3. Gillette Co. Vs. Miner US Supreme Court · Dec 06, 1982
  4. U.S. 154 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court Mintzes v. Buchanon
    Search
  5. U.S. 154 (1985) Mintzes v. Buchanon
    Search
  6. see 469 U.S. 1033 (1984), therefore is vacated, and the petition for certiorari is dismissed. See Warden v. Palermo
    Search
  7. single authority which, it is clear upon analysis, does not support, let alone require, such a disposition, see Warden v. Palermo
    Search
  8. U.S. 911 (1977). And it ignores the one precedent which does directly control on this question. See McMann v. Ross
    Search
  9. U. S. 759 , 397 U. S. 760 , n. 1 (1970). In McMann v. Ross
    Search
  10. that becomes moot either pending a decision on certiorari or after we have granted a writ of certiorari, except Warden v. Palermo
    Search
  11. United States v. Munsingwear
    Search
  12. emphasis added). Indeed, as the Court said in Duke Power Co. v. Greenwood
    Search
  13. in at least one obvious respect -- there, we had not granted the petition for certiorari. So also was the case in Dove v. United
    Search
  14. at the very least, the Court should vacate its writ of certiorari. Cf. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Vaughn
    Search
  15. obligation to avoid such confusion. This is easily achieved by following what heretofore, with the exception of Warden v. Palermo
    Search
  16. habeas. In a case on direct review, it may be necessary simply to dismiss the petition to avoid the result in Durham v. United
    Search
  17. U.S. Supreme Court Mintzes v. Buchanon
    Search
  18. See Warden v. Palermo
    Search
  19. Warden v. Palermo
    Search
  20. See McMann v. Ross
    Search
  21. In McMann v. Ross
    Search
  22. Duke Power Co. v. Greenwood
    Search
  23. Dove v. United
    Search
  24. Cf. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Vaughn
    Search
  25. of Warden v. Palermo
    Search
  26. Durham v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial