Citation network
Webb Vs. Bd. of Educ. of Dyer County
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 17, 1985
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
of Educ. of Dyer County, 471 U.S. 234 (1985) Webb v. BoardSearch
-
The reasoning in New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. CareySearch
-
Cf. Smith v. RobinsonSearch
-
in preparation for the court action, and therefore compensable under the rationale of Hensley v. EckerhartSearch
-
In New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. CareySearch
-
and therefore the reasoning in Carey is not applicable to this case. As we noted in Smith v. RobinsonSearch
-
suit. See Patsy v. FloridaSearch
-
II In Hensley v. EckerhartSearch
-
Brief for Petitioner 19 (quoting Hensley v. EckerhartSearch
-
on the matter. Tr. of Fee Hearing 10. Contemporaneously recorded time sheets are the preferred practice. See Hensley v. EckerhartSearch
-
at 259-260. Although the District Court rendered the award without the guidance of this Court's decisions in Hensley v. EckerhartSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 424 (1983), and Blum v. StensonSearch
-
Compare Ciechon v. CitySearch
-
of Chicago, 686 F.2d 511, 524-525 (CA7 1982), with 715 F.2d 254 (CA6 1983) (case below), Horacek v. ThoneSearch
-
F.2d 496, 499-500 (CA8 1983), Latino Project, Inc. v. CitySearch
-
of Camden, 701 F.2d 262, 264-265 (CA3 1983), Estes v. TuscaloosaSearch
-
County, 696 F.2d 898, 900 (CA11 1983) (per curiam), Redd v. LambertSearch
-
F.2d 1032, 1036-1037 (CA5 1982), and Blow v. LascarisSearch
-
F.2d 670, 671 (CA2) (per curiam), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 914 (1982). See also Bartholomew v. WatsonSearch
-
Brown v. BattakeSearch
-
H.R.Rep. No. 94-1558, p. 1 (1976). Cf. Burnett v. GrattanSearch
-
administrative proceedings. With respect to the first requirement, our decision in New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. CareySearch
-
Smith v. RobinsonSearch
-
reliance on ancillary state proceedings would be severely undermined. As the Ninth Circuit reasoned in Bartholomew v. WatsonSearch
-
in resolving disputes. Hensley v. EckerhartSearch
-
ante at 471 U. S. 244 , n. 20, quoting Hensley v. EckerhartSearch
-
in awarding fees, and that appellate deference accordingly should approach its zenith in this context. Hensley v. EckerhartSearch
-
these are matters appropriately left to remand. See Hensley v. EckerhartSearch
-
of attorney's fees in the absence of an express statutory authorization. See, e.g., Summit Valley Industries, Inc. v. CarpenterSearch
-
Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. WildernessSearch
-
H.R.Rep. No. 94-1558, p. 8 (1976). See also New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. CareySearch
-
for example, the House Report cited approvingly to Parker v. MatthewsSearch
-
F.Supp. 1059 (DC 1976), aff'd sub nom. Parker v. CalifanoSearch
-
Patsy v. FloridaSearch
-
Patsy v. FloridaSearch
-
action in federal court, see, e.g., Trainor v. HernandezSearch
-
Huggman v. PursueSearch
-
Harrison v. NAACPSearch
-
Bartholomew v. WatsonSearch
-
Neal v. BrimSearch
-
Blouin v. DembitzSearch
-
Bond v. StantonSearch
-
Northcross v. BoardSearch
-
In Burnett v. GrattanSearch
-
Ciechon v. ChicagoSearch
-
Webb v. BoardSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial