Citation network
ins Vs. Rios-pineda
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 13, 1985
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 444 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court INS v. Rios-PinedaSearch
-
U.S. 444 (1985) Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Rios-PinedaSearch
-
are satisfied, it remains in the discretion of the Attorney General to suspend, or refuse to suspend, deportation. INS v. JongSearch
-
the Court of Appeals reversed the decision of the BIA and remanded the case for further proceedings. Rios-Pineda v. UnitedSearch
-
exercise of discretion. The Court of Appeals reversed and directed the BIA to reopen the proceeding. Rios-Pineda v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 449 We have recently indicated that granting a motion to reopen is a discretionary matter with BIA. INS v. PhinpathyaSearch
-
of eligibility for suspension of deportation, the Attorney General had discretion to deny the motion to reopen. INS v. JongSearch
-
as a matter of discretion, he need not consider whether the threshold statutory eligibility requirements are met. INS v. BagamasbadSearch
-
incentive to prolong litigation in order to delay physical deportation for as long as possible. See, e.g., Sung Ja Oum v. INSSearch
-
Hibbert v. INSSearch
-
eligible for such suspension only because of the passage of time while their meritless appeals dragged on. See Leblanc v. INSSearch
-
Agustin v. INSSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Balani v. INSSearch
-
Der-Rong Chour v. INSSearch
-
Schieber v. INSSearch
-
INS v. JongSearch
-
Even prior to our decision in INS v. PhinpathyaSearch
-
that such an absence was an interruption of the period of continuous presence, the law itself was clear. See Heitland v. INSSearch
-
Segura-Viachi v. INSSearch
-
Barragan-Sanchez v. RosenbergSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court INS v. Rios-PinedaSearch
-
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Rios-PinedaSearch
-
Rios-Pineda v. UnitedSearch
-
BIA. INS v. PhinpathyaSearch
-
Sung Ja Oum v. INSSearch
-
See Leblanc v. INSSearch
-
See Heitland v. INSSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial