Citation network
Landreth Timber Co. Vs. Landreth
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 28, 1985
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 681 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court Landreth Timber Co. v. LandrethSearch
-
U.S. 681 (1985) Landreth Timber Co. v. LandrethSearch
-
within the definition of the Acts, United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSearch
-
of a company's stock was sold, thus inevitably leading to difficult questions of line-drawing. As explained in Gould v. RuefenachtSearch
-
of the stock of a closely held corporation. App. to Pet. for Cert. 13a. Relying on United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSearch
-
of the sale of business doctrine. 731 F.2d 1348 (1984). It agreed that it was bound by United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSearch
-
Blue Chip Stamps v. ManorSearch
-
Teamsters v. DanielSearch
-
As we have observed in the past, this definition is quite broad, Marine Bank v. WeaverSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
within the meaning of the Acts. As we observed in United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSearch
-
did not intend to provide a comprehensive federal remedy for Page 471 U. S. 688 all fraud, Marine Bank v. WeaverSearch
-
Teamsters Page 471 U. S. 692 v. DanielSearch
-
listed in the statutory definition would make the Acts' enumeration of many types of instruments superfluous. Golden v. GarafaloSearch
-
F.2d 1139, 1144 (CA2 1982). See Tcherepnin v. KnightSearch
-
in transactions where control passed to the purchaser would contravene the purposes of these provisions. Accord, Daily v. MorganSearch
-
Daily v. MorganSearch
-
U.S. at 421 U. S. 850 . As we recently suggested in a different context in Securities Industry Assn. v. BoardSearch
-
and what provisions for voting and veto rights were agreed upon by the parties. As we explain more fully in Gould v. RefenachtSearch
-
the applicability of the Acts would hardly be in the best interests of either party to a transaction. Cf. Marine Bank v. WeaverSearch
-
engage in extended discovery and litigation over a concept as often elusive as the passage of control. Accord, Golden v. GarafaloSearch
-
are virtually identical, and will be treated as such in our decisions dealing with the scope of the term. Marine Bank v. WeaverSearch
-
Respondents also rely on Tcherepnin v. KnightSearch
-
U. S. 332 (1967), and Marine Bank v. WeaverSearch
-
Weaver involved a certificate of deposit and a privately negotiated profit-sharing agreement. See Marine Bank v. WeaverSearch
-
respondents quote our statement in Teamsters v. DanielSearch
-
Post at 471 U. S. 698 . United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSearch
-
in the legislative history that Congress considered the type of transactions involved in this case and in Gould v. RuefenachtSearch
-
b) of the 1934 Act and Rule 10b-5 adopted by the Commission. What the Court said in Blue Chip Stamps v. ManorSearch
-
with the congressional enactment and with the role of the federal judiciary in interpreting it, See J. I. Case Co. v BorakSearch
-
Id. at 421 U. S. 737 . See also Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSearch
-
Sutter v. GroenSearch
-
concerned with transactions in securities that are traded in a public market. In United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSearch
-
under the definition. Cf. Chemical Bank v. ArthurSearch
-
The marketing to the public of a large portfolio of mortgage loans, however, might well be. See Sanders v. JohnSearch
-
This opinion applies also to No. 84-165, Gould v. RuefenachtSearch
-
Cf. Milnarik v. M-SSearch
-
not intended to displace state authority unless Congress has plainly indicated an intent to do so. See, e.g., Bennett v. NewSearch
-
Garcia v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. AltohellaSearch
-
F.2d 310, 316 (CA7 1971) (Stevens, J., for the court). Cf. Minnesota v. CloverSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Landreth Timber Co. v. LandrethSearch
-
of the Acts, United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSearch
-
Golden v. GarafaloSearch
-
See Tcherepnin v. KnightSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial