Citation network
Oklahoma City Vs. Tuttle
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 03, 1985
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 808 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court Oklahoma City v. TuttleSearch
-
U.S. 808 (1985) City of Oklahoma City v. TuttleSearch
-
liability without submitting proof of a single action taken by a municipal policymaker. The requirement of Monell v. NewSearch
-
would amount to permitting precisely the theory of strict respondeat superior liability rejected in Monell v. NewSearch
-
opinion with respect to Part III in which THE CHIEF JUSTICE, JUSTICE WHITE, and JUSTICE O'CONNOR joined. In Monell v. NewSearch
-
liability seemed to conflict with the decisions of other Courts of Appeals. 469 U.S. 814 (1984). See, e.g., Languirand v. HaydenSearch
-
Wellington v. DanielsSearch
-
F.2d 932, 936-937 (CA4 1983). But cf. Owens v. HaasSearch
-
an issue squarely presented to and decided by the Court of Appeals, and we will proceed to decide it. Cf. On Lee v. UnitedSearch
-
it merely provides remedies for deprivations of rights established elsewhere. See Baker v. McCollanSearch
-
this Page 471 U. S. 818 amendment, and the reasons given, were the basis for this Court's holding in Monroe v. PapeSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
standard. See, e.g., Bennett v. CitySearch
-
Gilmere v. CitySearch
-
was premised on the independent evidence, or solely on the inference sanctioned by the instruction. Cf. Stromberg v. CaliforniaSearch
-
violated the constitutional rights of pregnant employees by reason of our decision in Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleurSearch
-
This case was tried some three weeks prior to our decision in Harlow v. FitzgeraldSearch
-
charged on this aspect of the case. The facts of this case are, of course, very similar to the facts of Tennessee v. GarnerSearch
-
involves only statutory construction, so any error we may commit is subject to reversal by Congress. Cf. Burnet v. CoronadoSearch
-
turns in recent years. Monell was decided only seven years ago. That decision, of course, overruled Monroe v. Pape'sSearch
-
is by no means representative of all the contemporary authorities. Both the majority and dissenting opinions in Owen v. CitySearch
-
the famous case of Thayer v. BostonSearch
-
concur in the judgment reached by the Court today, I am unable to join the balance of the plurality opinion. Monell v. NewSearch
-
based solely on evidence regarding Rotramel's actions on the night of Tuttle's killing. II A Monell v. NewSearch
-
be broadly available to compensate individuals for violations of constitutional rights, see Owen v. CtySearch
-
the police officer's own unbalanced mental state is the most obvious example. Cf. Brandon v. HoltSearch
-
Respondent objects that, in Monell and Owen v. CitySearch
-
U. S. 661 , n. 2. This policy, of course, violated the interest we recognized in Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleurSearch
-
See Monell v. NewSearch
-
Monell, of course, the contours of municipal liability have become substantially clearer. See, e.g., Newport v. FactSearch
-
Owen v. CitySearch
-
permitted the jury to find the city liable even if the jury did not believe this direct evidence. Cf. Stromberg v. CaliforniaSearch
-
tort law for the purpose of allocating responsibility for the wrongful state action. The central holding in Monroe v. PapeSearch
-
as it is used in Part II of the opinion in Monell v. NewSearch
-
Moreover, in the Court's earlier decision in Monroe v. PapeSearch
-
in Monroe v. PapeSearch
-
Monell v. NewSearch
-
It should be noted that the contrary proposition announced in Part III of the Court's opinion in Monroe v. PapeSearch
-
that the doctrine of respondeat superior applied to the city. Compare Brief for Petitioners in Monroe v. PapeSearch
-
and id. at 25-27, with Brief for Respondents in Monroe v. PapeSearch
-
Id. at 436 U. S. 688 (footnotes omitted). See, e.g., 43 U. S. C. & C. R. Co. v. LetsonSearch
-
See also Cowles v. MercerSearch
-
In 1862, in Limpus v. LondonSearch
-
Allen v. CitySearch
-
Thayer v. BostonSearch
-
tort, will lie against a corporation, though formerly doubted, seems now too well settled to be questioned. Yarborough v. BankSearch
-
Smith v. BirminghamSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial