Citation network
Williams Vs. Vermont
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 04, 1985
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 14 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court Williams v. VermontSearch
-
U.S. 14 (1985) Williams v. VermontSearch
-
the complaint. The Vermont Supreme Court affirmed by citation to another decision handed down the same day, Leverson v. ConwaySearch
-
Court affirmed, 144 Vt. 649, 478 A.2d 993 (1984), by citation to another decision handed down the same day, Leverson v. ConwaySearch
-
credit a sales tax paid to another State against its Page 472 U. S. 22 own use tax. Southern Pacific Co. v. GallagherSearch
-
Henneford v. SilasSearch
-
regard to its general use tax. Such a requirement has been endorsed by at least one state court, Montgomery Ward & Co. v. StateSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Lehnhausen v. LakeSearch
-
U. S. 359 (1973). It has been reluctant to interfere with legislative policy decisions in this area. See Regan v. TaxationSearch
-
San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSearch
-
U. S. 176 , 462 U. S. 196 (1983). See generally Schweiker v. WilsonSearch
-
Halliburton Oil Well Co. v. ReilySearch
-
those within its borders unequalled solely on the basis of their different residences or States of incorporation. WHYY v. GlassboroSearch
-
identical burden, by taxing each. The distinction between them bears no relation to the statutory purpose. See Zobel v. WilliamsSearch
-
Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSearch
-
Leverson, 144 Vt. at 527, 481 A.2d at 1032, quoting Rowe-Genereux, Inc. v. DepartmentSearch
-
Henneford v. SilasSearch
-
the action was dismissed on the pleadings, and given the possible relevance of state law, see Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. DiasSearch
-
the need for equal treatment of taxpayers who can be distinguished only on the basis of residence. See also Henneford v. SilasSearch
-
U. S. 471 , 397 U. S. 485 (1970), quoting Lindsley v. NaturalSearch
-
concurring. I join the Court's opinion for the reasons stated therein and in my concurring opinion in Zobel v. WilliamsSearch
-
J. C. Penney Co. v. HardestySearch
-
tax exemption should easily pass the minimal scrutiny this Court routinely applies to tax statutes. See, e.g., Regan v. TaxationSearch
-
of the statute because the statute is ambiguously worded, and because the Supreme Court of Vermont, in Leverson v. ConwaySearch
-
classification that the Court previously has struck down on equal protection grounds. See Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. BowersSearch
-
Ante at 472 U. S. 28 , quoting Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. ReilySearch
-
Austin v. NewSearch
-
all States apparently forgo payment of their sales tax by out-of-state purchasers of automobiles, see J. C. Penney Co. v. HardestySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Williams v. VermontSearch
-
Leverson v. ConwaySearch
-
Montgomery Ward & Co. v. StateSearch
-
See Regan v. TaxationSearch
-
Schweiker v. WilsonSearch
-
WHYY v. GlassboroSearch
-
See Zobel v. WilliamsSearch
-
Rowe-Genereux, Inc. v. DepartmentSearch
-
Lindsley v. NaturalSearch
-
Zobel v. WilliamsSearch
-
Regan v. TaxationSearch
-
See Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. BowersSearch
-
Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. ReilySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial