Citation network
BaldwIn Vs. Alabama
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 17, 1985
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 372 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court Baldwin v. AlabamaSearch
-
U.S. 372 (1985) Baldwin v. AlabamaSearch
-
of death. Beck v. AlabamaSearch
-
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ruled that the scheme was facially unconstitutional. Ritter v. SmithSearch
-
Ala.Rule App. Proc. 39(c). See Beck v. StateSearch
-
Evans v. BrittonSearch
-
SD Ala.1979), rev'd on other grounds, 628 F.2d 400 (CA5 1980), 639 F.2d 221 (1981), rev'd sub nom. Hopper v. EvansSearch
-
petitioner contended that the 1975 Act was facially invalid. Tracking the reasoning of the Eleventh Circuit in Ritter v. SmithSearch
-
the dispositive sentence, the Alabama scheme would be unconstitutional under the principles announced in Woodson v. NorthSearch
-
Carolina, 428 U. S. 280 (1976) (plurality opinion), and Roberts (Stanislaus) v. LouisianaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 325 (1976) (plurality opinion). See Page 472 U. S. 380 also Roberts (Harry) v. LouisianaSearch
-
see also Page 472 U. S. 382 Eddings v. OklahomaSearch
-
Woodson v. NorthSearch
-
would violate the Constitution. Zant v. StephensSearch
-
as a recommendation as to the sentence the jury believed would be appropriate, cf. Proffitt v. FloridaSearch
-
See Proffitt v. FloridaSearch
-
Jacobs v. StateSearch
-
Beck v. StateSearch
-
Richardson v. StateSearch
-
footnote omitted). Page 472 U. S. 385 See also Ritter v. StateSearch
-
of death. He points to this Court's opinion in Beck v. AlabamaSearch
-
the first 50 defendants tried for capital crimes during the time the 1975 Act was in effect were acquitted. See Beck v. AlabamaSearch
-
U. S. 447 , 468 U. S. 464 (1984). See also Zant v. StephensSearch
-
Ala.Acts, No. 213, effective March 7, 1976. Act No. 213 was enacted in response to this Court's decision in Furman v. GeorgiaSearch
-
This Court, however, 448 U.S. 903 (1980), vacated and remanded the case for reconsideration in the light of Beck v. AlabamaSearch
-
ruled that due process requires a lesser included offense instruction only when warranted by the evidence, Hopper v. EvansSearch
-
independently weigh those circumstances to determine whether the imposition of a death sentence is appropriate. Jacobs v. StateSearch
-
Beck v. StateSearch
-
So.2d at 32. Upon reaffirming petitioner's conviction in light of Hopper v. EvansSearch
-
in violation of Lockett v. OhioSearch
-
Following this Court's decisions in Beck v. AlabamaSearch
-
U. S. 625 (1980), and Hopper v. EvansSearch
-
Emphasis in original.) Beck v. StateSearch
-
Ex parte Baldwin, 456 So.2d 129, 138 (Ala.1984) (quoting Ritter v. SmithSearch
-
penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. GeorgiaSearch
-
App. 18. In my dissenting opinion in Spaziano v. FloridaSearch
-
unless the jury is willing to violate a sworn oath and nullify the evidence, the death sentence is automatic. See Beck v. AlabamaSearch
-
Roberts v. LouisianaSearch
-
cannot be said to represent the sort of considered community judgment the Court has approved in the past. See Jurek v. TexasSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Baldwin v. AlabamaSearch
-
Ritter v. SmithSearch
-
See Beck v. StateSearch
-
Hopper v. EvansSearch
-
and Roberts (Stanislaus) v. LouisianaSearch
-
Roberts (Harry) v. LouisianaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial