Citation network
United States Vs. Albertini
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 24, 1985
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 675 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. AlbertiniSearch
-
U.S. 675 (1985) United States v. AlbertiniSearch
-
by his reentry during the open house. Flower v. UnitedSearch
-
Greer v. SpockSearch
-
U. S. 171 , 461 U. S. 175 -176 (1983), quoting Crowell v. BensonSearch
-
in applying criminal laws generally must follow the plain and unambiguous meaning of the statutory language. Garcia v. UnitedSearch
-
this interpretative canon is not a license for the judiciary to rewrite language enacted by the legislature. Heckler v. MathewsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
of the Constitution. United States v. LockeSearch
-
Park 'N Fly v. DollarSearch
-
Cf. Heckler v. ChaneySearch
-
barring reentry. This argument misperceives the knowledge required for a violation of the statute. Cf. United States v. ParrillaSearch
-
defendant's state of mind, and there is no requirement that the Government prove improper motive or intent. Holdridge v. UnitedSearch
-
respondent thought the bar order was no longer effective, he was thereby immunized from prosecution. Cf. United States v. InternationalSearch
-
is ordinarily not a public forum for First Amendment purposes even if it is open to the public. See Greer v. SpockSearch
-
U. S. 828 (1976). Nonetheless, the court relied on Flower v. UnitedSearch
-
not only the right to exclude civilian traffic from the avenue, but also any right to exclude leafleteers. Greer v. SpockSearch
-
United States v. FlowerSearch
-
Page 472 U. S. 686 civilian traffic and any claim of special interest in regulating expression, see Greer v. SpockSearch
-
discretion by the base commander to exclude him from the base violates the First Amendment. Cf. Shuttlesworth v. BirminghamSearch
-
U.S. at 424 U. S. 836 . See also United States v. GraceSearch
-
because the base was used to communicate ideas or information during the open house. United States Postal Service v. GreenburghSearch
-
as government regulation of a traditional public forum simply because an open house was held at Hickam. See Greer v. SpockSearch
-
contends that allowing an exception in the particular case will not threaten important government interests. See Clark v. CommunitySearch
-
have entered a military base to see if they will conduct themselves properly during an open house. Cf. Perry Ed. Assn. v. PerrySearch
-
a claim that he was selectively prosecuted for engaging in activities protected by the First Amendment. Cf. Wayte v. UnitedSearch
-
base, this power cannot be exercised in a manner that is patently arbitrary or discriminatory. Cafeteria Workers v. McElroySearch
-
argument proves too much, and the evidentiary arguments prove too little. I In Cafeteria Workers v. McElroySearch
-
United States v. BrownSearch
-
injunction that 'ambiguity concerning the ambit of criminal statutes should be resolved in favor of lenity,' Rewis v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. UnitedSearch
-
Moreover, highways or other public easements often bisect military reservations. Cf. Flower v. UnitedSearch
-
The record in Greer v. SpockSearch
-
Spock v. DavidSearch
-
Flower v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. QuiltySearch
-
United States v. MaySearch
-
months), cert. denied sub nom. Phipps v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. DouglassSearch
-
Government of Canal Zone v. BrooksSearch
-
United States v. JelinskiSearch
-
Weissman v. UnitedSearch
-
Holdridge v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial