Citation network
Hooper Vs. Bernalillo County Assessor
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 24, 1985
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Hooper v. BernalilloSearch
-
County Assessor - 472 U.S. 612 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court Hooper v. BernalilloSearch
-
County Assessor, 472 U.S. 612 (1985) Hooper v. BernalilloSearch
-
toward the Nation's military effort in Vietnam. Such an objective is not a legitimate state purpose. Zobel v. WilliamsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
The New Mexico veterans' tax exemption differs from the durational residence requirements the Court examined in Sosna v. IowaSearch
-
Memorial Hospital v. MaricopaSearch
-
and Shapiro v. ThompsonSearch
-
veterans who established residence after that date do not. Like the Alaska dividend distribution law examined in Zobel v. WilliamsSearch
-
be subjected to the higher level of scrutiny applied to the durational residence requirements in Memorial Hospital v. MaricopaSearch
-
County, supra, and Shapiro v. ThompsonSearch
-
the statute cannot withstand the minimum rationality inquiry applied to the Alaska dividend distribution law in Zobel v. WilliamsSearch
-
Regan v. TaxationSearch
-
Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySearch
-
Russell v. HodgesSearch
-
F.2d 212, 218 (CA2 1972). See Regan v. TaxationSearch
-
visa-vis non-veterans does not offend the Equal Protection Clause. See, e.g., Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySearch
-
Johnson v. RobisonSearch
-
not be discriminated against solely on the basis of their arrival in the State after May 8, 1976. See, e.g., Vlandis v. KlineSearch
-
state law, whether the state legislature would have enacted the statute without the invalid portion. See, e.g., Zobel v. WilliamsSearch
-
Champlin Refining Co. v. CorporationSearch
-
State v. SpearmanSearch
-
residence cases, the Court reviewed state laws which established waiting periods on access to divorce courts, Sosna v. IowaSearch
-
eligibility for free nonemergency medical care, Memorial Hospital v. MaricopaSearch
-
qualification for voting rights, Dunn v. BlumsteinSearch
-
and receipt of welfare assistance, Shapiro v. ThompsonSearch
-
appellants' constitutional right to travel. Despite disagreement over its source in the Constitution, compare Zobel v. WilliamsSearch
-
Memorial Hospital v. MaricopaSearch
-
Zobel, supra, at 457 U. S. 62 , n. 9. See Shapiro v. ThompsonSearch
-
have survived challenges under the Equal Protection Clause before Zobel was decided. See, e.g., Langston v. LevittSearch
-
August v. BronsteinSearch
-
Leech v. Veterans'Search
-
Bonus Division Appeals, 179 Conn.311, 426 A.2d 289 (1979). The Court's summary affirmance in August v. BronsteinSearch
-
may not be read as an adoption of the reasoning of the judgment under review. Zobel v. WilliamsSearch
-
could not pass muster under the Equal Protection Clause in light of the Court's holding in Zobel. Soto-Lopez v. NewSearch
-
In Zobel v. WilliamsSearch
-
concurring. I join the Court's opinion for the reasons stated therein and in my concurring opinion in Zobel v. WilliamsSearch
-
New Orleans v. DukesSearch
-
For these reasons, New Mexico's statute is not at all like the Alaska dividend program struck down in Zobel v. WilliamsSearch
-
U. S. 380 , 441 U. S. 411 -412 (1979) (STEVENS, J., dissenting) (footnotes omitted). See also Vance v. BradleySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial