Citation network
Phillips Petroleum Co. Vs. Shutts
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 26, 1985
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 797 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSearch
-
U.S. 797 (1985) Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSearch
-
were on Kansas land. After petitioner's mandamus petition to decertify the class was denied, Phillips Petroleum v. DuckworthSearch
-
on an earlier, unrelated class action involving the same nominal plaintiff and the same defendant, Shutts, Executor v. PhillipsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
court did not possess personal jurisdiction over absent plaintiff class members as required by International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSearch
-
court is, of course, a federal question which does not depend on the party's prior standing in state court. Doremus v. BoardSearch
-
Valley Forge Christian College v. AmericansSearch
-
United for Separation of Church and State, Inc., 454 U. S. 464 , 454 U. S. 472 (1982). See Simon v. EasternSearch
-
Arlington Heights v. MetropolitanSearch
-
Gladstone, Realtors v. VillageSearch
-
is that a litigant must normally assert his own legal interests rather than those of third parties. See Singleton v. WulffSearch
-
claim in this Court. Petitioner's posture is somewhat similar to the trust settlor defendant in Hanson v. DencklaSearch
-
Id. at 357 U. S. 245 , quoting Chicago v. AtchisonSearch
-
that term is used in cases involving personal jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants. E.g., International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSearch
-
World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSearch
-
into the forum. 444 U.S. at 444 U. S. 297 . In Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. CompagnieSearch
-
all dealt with out-of-state defendants or parties in the procedural posture of a defendant, cf. New York Life Ins. Co. v. DunlevySearch
-
that a chose in action is a constitutionally recognized property interest possessed by each of the plaintiffs. Mullane v. CentralSearch
-
A class action plaintiff, however, is in quite a different posture. The Court noted this difference in Hansberry v. LeeSearch
-
bound by judgment in personam unless one was made fully a party in the traditional sense. Ibid., citing Pennoyer v. NeffSearch
-
absent plaintiffs would not be adequately represented and were not amenable to jurisdiction. See Phillips Petroleum v. DuckworthSearch
-
Eisen v. CarlisleSearch
-
the one hand, and defendants in nonclass civil suits on the other. Any plaintiff may consent to jurisdiction. Keeton v. HustlerSearch
-
Rendezvous Trails of America, Inc. v. AyersSearch
-
Smith v. RobinsonSearch
-
West Edmond Hunton Lime Unit v. YoungSearch
-
Cf. Webster Drilling Co. v. SterlingSearch
-
Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann., Art. 5069-1.03 (Vernon 1971). See Phillips Petroleum Co. v. StahlSearch
-
Phillips Petroleum Co. v. AdamsSearch
-
Maxey v. TexasSearch
-
royalty owner and pay him the suspended royalty while the price increase is still tentative. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. RiversideSearch
-
laws to all claims would be constitutional. Four Terms ago we addressed a similar situation in Allstate Ins. Co. v. HagueSearch
-
would require or support the application of only Kansas law to all these claims. See, e.g., Hartford Life Ins. Co. v. IbsSearch
-
moving to the forum, we have generally accorded such a move little or no significance. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. YatesSearch
-
Home Ins. Co. v. DickSearch
-
Pacific Employees Ins. Co. v. IndustrialSearch
-
several choices of law. But the constitutional limitations laid down in cases such as Allstate and Home Ins. Co. v. DickSearch
-
Wurzlow v. PlacidSearch
-
U. S. 816 . A fair reading of the Kansas Supreme Court's opinion in light of its earlier opinion in Shutts v. PhillipsSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial